2017
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00362.2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood pressure reduction after gastric bypass surgery is explained by a decrease in cardiac output

Abstract: The reason for the decrease in blood pressure (BP) in the first weeks after gastric bypass surgery remains to be elucidated. We show that the reduction in BP following surgery is caused by a decrease in cardiac output. In addition, the maximal ascending slope in systolic blood pressure decreased suggesting a reduction in left ventricular contractility and cardiac workload. These findings help to understand the physiological changes following gastric bypass surgery and are relevant in light of the increased ris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The changes in HR we observed following reduction in BMI are similar to those reported in overweight young adults [17]. Stroke volume [18], measured by Doppler echocardiography, did not decrease significantly, so the significant decrease in CO both post-diet and post-surgery reflects the changes in HR. Contrary to expectation, the lack of change in LV mass and geometry over the study may be explained by the relatively short follow-up period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The changes in HR we observed following reduction in BMI are similar to those reported in overweight young adults [17]. Stroke volume [18], measured by Doppler echocardiography, did not decrease significantly, so the significant decrease in CO both post-diet and post-surgery reflects the changes in HR. Contrary to expectation, the lack of change in LV mass and geometry over the study may be explained by the relatively short follow-up period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Blood pressure and central hemodynamics were assessed via a Nexfin device (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) that utilizes the volume-clamp method to measure blood pressure and heart rate, while cardiac output was estimated using the CO-trek algorithm [ 65 ]. Heart rate variability, a marker of sympathovagal balance, was determined by calculating the standard deviation of the normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN, inter-beat intervals derived from continuous blood pressure recordings after filtering) [ 66 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All potential sources of bias, including selection bias, performance bias, detection bias and information bias, were assessed (Table 2). Eleven studies 19,21,22,24,25,27,29,32–35 had a low risk of bias, 7 studies 10,12,18,20,26,30,31 had a moderate risk of bias and 2 studies had a high risk of bias 23,28 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%