2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2013.01.996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Pressure Measurement in Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only 25.7% of the centers in this survey required patients to measure their BP at home. According to recent publications, the standard Doppler measurement systems may not be ideal for home use because measurements depend on operator experience and can more closely reflect systolic BP rather than mean arterial pressures for nonpulsatile patients (15,16). Alternative Outpatient management of HVAS patients from a VAD coordinator survey 556 systems such as the Terumo Elemano (Terumo Medical Corp.) have been recommended because their accuracy and relative inexpensiveness (15) could make them cost effective for home use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only 25.7% of the centers in this survey required patients to measure their BP at home. According to recent publications, the standard Doppler measurement systems may not be ideal for home use because measurements depend on operator experience and can more closely reflect systolic BP rather than mean arterial pressures for nonpulsatile patients (15,16). Alternative Outpatient management of HVAS patients from a VAD coordinator survey 556 systems such as the Terumo Elemano (Terumo Medical Corp.) have been recommended because their accuracy and relative inexpensiveness (15) could make them cost effective for home use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Woldendorp et al 11 examined sphygmomanometry combined with finger pulse oximetry to measure blood pressure in RBP recipients. In total, 98% of all measurements were successful and Bland-Altman analysis indicated a mean difference of 3.2 mmHg and a standard deviation (SD) of 7.3 mmHg compared to invasive intra-arterial recordings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%