| INTRODUCTIONArterial hypertension is one of the major modifiable risk factors of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. There is large evidence from meta-analysis of observational studies as well as pooled individual data that ambulatory BP is superior for prediction of clinical CV outcomes compared to office BP. This prognostical superiority has been consistently documented in both untreated and treated hypertensive patients.
2Moreover, in the attempt for better BP assessment, non-invasive estimation of central hemodynamics has been put into focus.Pathophysiologically, central pressure in the aorta, which is the perfusion pressure to key organs, (rather than the pressure in the arm) may provide more relevant prognostic information. Indeed, it has been shown in a population-based study 5 and in a hypertension trial 6 that the noninvasively measured central BP is superior to brachial BP in predicting CV outcomes. In general, the dissociation between central and brachial BP has been observed to be greater at higher baseline BP levels, regardless of the treatment strategy used. Hence, the aim of the present prospective observational study was to assess the effect of RDN on central ambulatory BP and hemodynamic parameters under ambulatory conditions.Christian Ott, Klaas F. Franzen, Michael Reppel and Kai Mortensen contributed equally to the manuscript.