2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.09.547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging using T2-prepared steady-state free-precession imaging in comparison to contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it would be clinically laborious to perform PET perfusion imaging followed by BOLD MRI in the practice setting, as this would subject patients to considerable time and financial commitments in addition to the inconvenience of undergoing two sequential vasodilator stress tests, unless there is widespread clinical adoption of combined PET‐MRI systems in the future. Several studies have shown correlation between MRI‐derived MBF using gadolinium first‐pass perfusion with BOLD MRI . However, given real concerns over gadolinium exposure, neural gadolinium retention, and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, there is a clear clinical need for a contrast‐free MR alternative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it would be clinically laborious to perform PET perfusion imaging followed by BOLD MRI in the practice setting, as this would subject patients to considerable time and financial commitments in addition to the inconvenience of undergoing two sequential vasodilator stress tests, unless there is widespread clinical adoption of combined PET‐MRI systems in the future. Several studies have shown correlation between MRI‐derived MBF using gadolinium first‐pass perfusion with BOLD MRI . However, given real concerns over gadolinium exposure, neural gadolinium retention, and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, there is a clear clinical need for a contrast‐free MR alternative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oxygenation‐sensitive CMR SSFP sequence has been demonstrated to have improved image quality compared to oxygenation‐sensitive T2* sequences at both 1.5 and 3 T magnetic field . Karamitsos and colleagues compared OS‐CMR with PET in patients with known CAD.…”
Section: Utility Of Os‐cmr In Ischaemic Heart Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, OS-CMR signal intensity was investigated in subjects having exercise induced angina and this was compared with invasive coronary angiography and thallium single Oxygenation-sensitive CMR SSFP sequence has been demonstrated to have improved image quality compared to oxygenationsensitive T2* sequences at both 1.5 and 3 T magnetic field. 17,18 Karamitsos and colleagues compared OS-CMR with PET in patients with known CAD. They observed a good agreement between OS-CMR and PET regarding the presence or absence of ischaemia.…”
Section: Utilit Yofos-cmrinischaemi C He Artd Is E a S Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Importantly, the transmurality of stress-inducible perfusion deficits on first-pass imaging had a significant relationship with the observed BOLD signal intensity increase. Based on a single slice approach, Friedrich et al 44 demonstrated that BOLD CMR imaging yielded comparable sensitivities to thallium SPECT for the detection of severe coronary stenosis (i.e., [75% luminal narrowing).…”
Section: Clinical Studies Using Bold Cmr Imagingmentioning
confidence: 92%