1961
DOI: 10.1097/00132586-196102000-00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Loss During Vaginal Hysterectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This rate is rather higher than 12 per cent reported by Taylor and Hanson (1961) and Watson (1963). The increased incidence in our series of younger women can be explained by better pelvic blood supply; a theory which is supported by Pratt et al (1960) who demonstrated an increased blood loss in similar patients during vaginal surgery. An additional factor may be the low incidence of marked uterine descent — in only 10 per cent of cases were there symptoms of prolapse — thus suggesting that most of the vaginal operations were performed on what more conservative surgeons might have considered difficult or unsuitable cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This rate is rather higher than 12 per cent reported by Taylor and Hanson (1961) and Watson (1963). The increased incidence in our series of younger women can be explained by better pelvic blood supply; a theory which is supported by Pratt et al (1960) who demonstrated an increased blood loss in similar patients during vaginal surgery. An additional factor may be the low incidence of marked uterine descent — in only 10 per cent of cases were there symptoms of prolapse — thus suggesting that most of the vaginal operations were performed on what more conservative surgeons might have considered difficult or unsuitable cases.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%