1978
DOI: 10.1159/000459803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Groups of Macaques: a Comparative Study

Abstract: Distribution of the human-type and of the simian-type blood groups in rhesus, crab-eating, bonnet, pig-tailed and stump-tailed macaques revealed significant similarities and differences among these species. Human-type A-B-O blood groups cut across taxonomic lines and seem of less value for taxonomic purposes than the simiantype blood groups detected by cross-reacting isoimmune rhesus monkey sera.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
2

Year Published

1979
1979
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(29 reference statements)
3
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are consistent with previous studies that reported group B as the major blood type (ϳ97%) found in rhesus macaques (25,34). On the other hand, Malaivijitnond et al described the polymorphism of the ABO blood group in rhesus macaques in Thailand, although variation among troops from different geographic locations was significant (30).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our findings are consistent with previous studies that reported group B as the major blood type (ϳ97%) found in rhesus macaques (25,34). On the other hand, Malaivijitnond et al described the polymorphism of the ABO blood group in rhesus macaques in Thailand, although variation among troops from different geographic locations was significant (30).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…HBGA phenotyping of 500 rhesus monkeys of the Tulane colony revealed majority of animals being type B. Although this result is consistent with some historical studies conducted in 1970's [27] , results conducted with freeranging macaques in Thailand showed more polymorphic distribution [24] . Unpublished results conducted by our group at Tulane indicate differences between the Indian vs Chinese origin rhesus macaques: The Chinese macaques appear to have more human-like distribution (14% type A, 65% B, 11% O and 10% AB) than Indian macaques (97% Sestak K. Histo-blood group antigens as calicivirus receptors type B) (Farkas T personal communication).…”
Section: Considerations For Pre-clinical Studies With Pathogens That supporting
confidence: 88%
“…It was proposed that human NoVs bind with carbohydrate moieties of the ABH and Lewis antigens when these are secreted into biological fluids and that such binding is associated with productive infection and illness [27][28][29] . In fact, inhibition of HBGA binding was suggested as an antiviral strategy for treatment of NoV infection [30] .…”
Section: Are Hbgas Primary or Secondary Determinants Of Enteric CV Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reverse typing, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and saliva-inhibition tests (SIT) have all been performed to identify the A and B antigens in macaques [Kim et al, 2015; Malaivijitnond et al, 2008; Moor-Jankowski and Socha, 1978; Premasuthan et al, 2012]. Both reverse typing and SIT protocols require fresh macaque blood or saliva samples of sufficient quantity and quality, which are not always available, especially for archived tissue samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reverse typing, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and saliva-inhibition tests (SITs) have all been performed to identify the A and B antigens in macaques ( Figure 1). 5,[7][8][9] Both reverse typing and SIT protocols require fresh macaque blood or saliva samples of sufficient quantity and quality, which are not always available, especially for archived tissue samples. Accurate reverse typing of the A and B agglutinins in macaques by the presence of serum antibodies requires absorbing non-specific (eg, anti-human) agglutinins from macaque sera with type O human RBCs before reacting the sera with known type A and type B RBCs, a critical step that is sometimes omitted from protocols by researchers that consequently leads to false positive tests for the type O blood group phenotype.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%