2011
DOI: 10.1186/cc9812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood glucose variability, measured as mean absolute glucose, strongly depends on the frequency of blood glucose level measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baghurst et al ( 26 ) showed that as glucose values separate in time (>4 h between readings), the use of MAGE becomes less reliable than SD to estimate GV. Similarly, Harmsen et al ( 27 ) found that using MAG to estimate GV accurately requires similar glucose measurement frequencies, which were not available in our sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Baghurst et al ( 26 ) showed that as glucose values separate in time (>4 h between readings), the use of MAGE becomes less reliable than SD to estimate GV. Similarly, Harmsen et al ( 27 ) found that using MAG to estimate GV accurately requires similar glucose measurement frequencies, which were not available in our sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The method and frequency of glucose determination has a significant impact on variability measures as already shown with mean absolute glucose change per hour [27]. Mean daily delta was naturally higher when calculated from CGMS compared to BGA values as the gap between minimum and maximum glucose increases with the number of measured values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dilution of the reference blood sample with a glucose-free solution tends to lower the plasma glucose concentration by a small percentage. 64,81 Contamination of a reference blood sample with any glucose-containing solution may be problematic because a D5W solution (5% dextrose in water) has a 5000 mg/dl glucose concentration. There is a high probability that many of the paired data points with low correlation were caused by preanalytical and analytical error in the reference YSI glucose measurement, and not an error in the IVBG System glucose measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%