1989
DOI: 10.1117/12.978001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood Flow Changes In Transplantable Urothelial Tumors Treated With The Metallopurpurin, SnET2 And Light.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other authors (Kavarnos et al, 1994;Ma et al, 1993b;Berg et al, 1995) suggest that the variations observed in the interaction of PDT and ionizing radiation depend on dose and variation in timing between the two treatments. In vivo, photodynamic therapy is usually accompanied by severe microvascular changes (Nelson et al, 1987) associated with endothelial damage, microcirculatory stasis, platelet aggregation and haemorrhage, resulting in a coagulation necrosis (Bugelski et al, 1981;Selman et al, 1984;Star et al, 1986;Chaudhuri et al, 1987). These additional effects make it difficult to extrapolate in vitro studies on cell lines to the clinical situation where the combined approach of radiotherapy and photodynamic therapy may have quite different effectiveness than that presented in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Other authors (Kavarnos et al, 1994;Ma et al, 1993b;Berg et al, 1995) suggest that the variations observed in the interaction of PDT and ionizing radiation depend on dose and variation in timing between the two treatments. In vivo, photodynamic therapy is usually accompanied by severe microvascular changes (Nelson et al, 1987) associated with endothelial damage, microcirculatory stasis, platelet aggregation and haemorrhage, resulting in a coagulation necrosis (Bugelski et al, 1981;Selman et al, 1984;Star et al, 1986;Chaudhuri et al, 1987). These additional effects make it difficult to extrapolate in vitro studies on cell lines to the clinical situation where the combined approach of radiotherapy and photodynamic therapy may have quite different effectiveness than that presented in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The presence of molecular oxygen is mandatory for the photodynamic process to occur, as cytotoxicity and subsequent tissue destruction requires a transfer of energy from the excited photosensitizer molecule to singlet oxygen, followed by interaction with the biological substrate (Moan et al, 1979;MacRobert et al, 1989). Photodynamic therapy is usually accompanied in vivo by severe microvascular changes (Nelson et al, 1987) associated with endothelial damage, microcirculatory stasis, platelet aggregation and haemorrhage, resulting in a coagulation necrosis (Bugelski et al, 1981;Selman et al, 1984;Star et al, 1986;Chaudhuri et al, 1987). A distinct advantage of using ALA to generate PpIX as an in situ photosensitizer is the relatively rapid clearance of photoactive substances from the body.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cells from murine tumours remaining in situ after PDT undergo necrosis, whereas those explanted immediately after photoactivation remain viable in vitro, suggesting that local tissue factors may play an important role (Henderson et al, 1985). Blood flow changes resulting from PDT were first quantified by Selman et al (1984) in transplantable bladder tumours treated with HPD (lIOgg-1) and red light (630 J cm-2). Using a radioactive microsphere technique they demonstrated a significant reduction in blood flow to tumours 10min and 24 h after the end of photoactivation.…”
Section: Discs_shmentioning
confidence: 99%