2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2010.01376.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood donors in Kenya: a comparison of voluntary and family replacement donors based on a population‐based survey

Abstract: The majority of blood donors in Kenya are voluntary with lower potential risk of TTI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
27
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(24 reference statements)
6
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, we have found that HBsAg seroprevalence was significantly higher among volunteer donors compared to family and replacement donors. It is well known that collecting blood from voluntary, non-remunerated donors is associated with increased safety in blood transfusion [3] and there are numerous studies indicating that the positive results in TTI agents among blood donors were considerably lower in voluntary unpaid donor population [43][44][45][46]. Nevertheless, Allain et al found no statistically significant differences between family and voluntary donors in terms of TTI positivity rates [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Interestingly, we have found that HBsAg seroprevalence was significantly higher among volunteer donors compared to family and replacement donors. It is well known that collecting blood from voluntary, non-remunerated donors is associated with increased safety in blood transfusion [3] and there are numerous studies indicating that the positive results in TTI agents among blood donors were considerably lower in voluntary unpaid donor population [43][44][45][46]. Nevertheless, Allain et al found no statistically significant differences between family and voluntary donors in terms of TTI positivity rates [47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These non-TNBTS units were especially important in reducing the unmet demand in hospitals that were small, rural, or faith based (more than 50% of supply from non-TNBTS sources) and among children, almost half of whom received non-TNBTS components. To the degree that this blood may be less safe due to collection from paid or coerced donors or due to poor screening for blood-borne pathogens [27], people receiving blood components in these hospitals and children may be at a greater risk for transfusion-associated infections with HIV, HBV, HCV, or syphilis. However, because non-TNBTS blood is used in all hospital types, sizes, and locations studied, interventions should be taken to improve blood quality outside the NBTS system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that these other donation systems may be needed in developing and developed countries (Allain, ), even though the WHO guidelines for transfusion state that blood donation must be exclusively voluntary and replacement donation should be avoided (Tapko et al ., ). Of course, if the alternative processes result in less understanding of blood donation there could be unintended consequences, such as people not fully informing health services about their health status when donating for monetary reasons (Eastlund, ) or to assist family members (Kimani et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%