2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.medin.2013.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood culture differential time to positivity enables safe catheter retention in suspected catheter-related bloodstream infection: a randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the decision of whether to remove and reinsert CVCs in critically ill patients with suspected CRBSI has been a debated issue in the management of ICU patients [ 5 , 8 , 10 , 15 ], in whom suspected and confirmed CRBSI are one entity and initial management is usually identical. To date, only a few studies have directly or indirectly compared the benefit and harm between reinsertion and no reinsertion in patients whose CVCs have been removed [ 16 18 ]. For example, an observational study of 60 cancer patients reported that catheter removal and reinsertion were associated with a moderate to severe symptom burden [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the decision of whether to remove and reinsert CVCs in critically ill patients with suspected CRBSI has been a debated issue in the management of ICU patients [ 5 , 8 , 10 , 15 ], in whom suspected and confirmed CRBSI are one entity and initial management is usually identical. To date, only a few studies have directly or indirectly compared the benefit and harm between reinsertion and no reinsertion in patients whose CVCs have been removed [ 16 18 ]. For example, an observational study of 60 cancer patients reported that catheter removal and reinsertion were associated with a moderate to severe symptom burden [ 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A randomized trial showed that mortality did not differ between the catheter removal group and the watchful waiting group in 64 patients with suspected CRBSI [ 17 ]. Another randomized controlled trial showed that among 52 patients with suspected CRBSI, the mortality rate in patients who underwent immediate reinsertion and delayed reinsertion of new catheters was not different [ 18 ]. Studies with small sample sizes cannot provide strong evidence regarding the association between CVC reinsertion and mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[711] and provided the early primary positive result to the clinicians. In addition, the early detection of organisms contributes to optimizing antimicrobial therapy for children [12, 13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study showed most pathogens as Gram‐negative bacilli, mainly of refractory Acinetobacter baumannii , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Maltophilias, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa , similar to previous studies. The risk factors of catheter‐related infections include nutrition status, severity of the disease, catheter placement and indwelling time, history of surgery and so forth . Multiple studies have indicated a marked increase of infection risk 10 days after catheterization .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A generalized concept of catheter‐related infection covers the following three aspects: (i) Catheter‐related bloodstream infection (CRBSI): Clinical presentation of infection‐related symptoms, with at least 1 blood culture obtained by peripheral venipuncture and catheter tip culture, or separate culture of catheter tip and peripheral blood samples revealing the same bacteria ; (ii) Catheter‐related colonization (CRCOL): Presentation of clinical symptoms and catheter tip culture with at least one microbial colonization ; and (iii) Suspected catheter‐related infection: Presentation of clinical symptoms excluding other underlying causes, with negative microbial culture .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%