2008
DOI: 10.1136/vr.162.7.203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood culture and stimulation conditions for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in cervids by the Cervigam assay

Abstract: Waters, W. R.; Palmer, M. V.; Thacker, T. C.; Orloski, K.; Nol, P.; Harrington, N. P.; Olsen, S. C.; and Nonnecke, B. J., "Blood culture and stimulation conditions for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in cervids by the Cervigam assay" (2008). Michigan Bovine Tuberculosis Bibliography and Database. 82.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vitro assays of cellmediated immunity, such as the gamma interferon enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), have shown promise in this regard for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. bovis infection of humans (6) and cattle (36), respectively. They remain, however, complex tests that require processing of the blood sample within 24 h, are subject to complications associated with overnight delivery (e.g., temperature fluctuations and delays) (46), and involve an antigen stimulation step necessitating at least one working day to complete the test. Serological assays, in contrast, are rapid, inexpensive, easy to perform, and not subject to the sampling and processing variables of cellular assays, making them well suited to field sampling.…”
Section: Comparison Of Single-antigen (Fluorescence Polarization Assamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro assays of cellmediated immunity, such as the gamma interferon enzymelinked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), have shown promise in this regard for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M. bovis infection of humans (6) and cattle (36), respectively. They remain, however, complex tests that require processing of the blood sample within 24 h, are subject to complications associated with overnight delivery (e.g., temperature fluctuations and delays) (46), and involve an antigen stimulation step necessitating at least one working day to complete the test. Serological assays, in contrast, are rapid, inexpensive, easy to perform, and not subject to the sampling and processing variables of cellular assays, making them well suited to field sampling.…”
Section: Comparison Of Single-antigen (Fluorescence Polarization Assamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an easy-to-use test which can be performed in the field with only a small volume of blood, serum, or plasma, the CervidTB STAT-PAK is potentially a valuable alternative to mycobacterial culture and cell-based assays currently available for use in cervids (23). This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the CervidTB STAT-PAK on serum from deer against the culture of M. bovis from deer tissues obtained during DEFRA's survey of tuberculosis in deer in southwestern England and the Cotswolds and a similar survey of deer in Wales.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, handling of wild boar is dangerous, which compromises such inteventions. In deer, there are more data available and several immunological assays, including an assay to detect IFN-, have been reported for pre-slaughter detection of M. bovis infection in live animals (Lyashchenko et al, 2008;Waters et al, 2008;Buddle et al, 2010;Jaroso et al, 2010b;Queiros et al, 2012). A fuller assessment of many assays is required, but control programmes are in place that are supported by application of the single or comparative skin test, although false responses due to sensitisation to other mycobacteria may occur, hampering diagnostic specificity (Queiros et al, 2012).…”
Section: Risk and Risk-reducing Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%