1992
DOI: 10.1136/oem.49.9.658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood concentration of carbon disulphide in "normal" subjects and in alcoholic subjects treated with disulfiram.

Abstract: Assay of free and acid labile carbon disulphide (free and total CS2 respectively) in human blood was performed by gas chromatography/ spectrometry. The method used a large dynamic head space volume and a "cryogenic trap". Blood CS2 concentration was measured in 42 subjects not occupationally exposed to CS2 (group A) and in 11 alcoholic subjects (group B) treated with disulfiram. Free CS2 concentration showed a mean value of 261 ng/l in the 42 subjects in group A and 9482 ng/l in eight subjects ofgroup B. Total… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(1 reference statement)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is considerable support 787 DISULFIRAM NEUROTOXICITY J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, Vol 59, September, 2000 in the literature for the hypothesis that disulfiram mediates its neurotoxicity through release of a carbon disulfide (CS 2 ) metabolite (14,16,18,22). This hypothesis has been advanced based on the clinical similarity between disulfiram and CS 2 neuropathy and the measurement of CS 2 and CS 2 metabolites in the breath and urine, respectively, following administration of disulfiram (23,24). CS 2 is a well-documented neurotoxicant that produces a central-peripheral distal axonopathy characterized by the formation of axonal swellings, degeneration, and atrophy (25,26).…”
Section: Disulfiram (Bis(diethylthiocarbamoyl)disulfide or Antabusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is considerable support 787 DISULFIRAM NEUROTOXICITY J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, Vol 59, September, 2000 in the literature for the hypothesis that disulfiram mediates its neurotoxicity through release of a carbon disulfide (CS 2 ) metabolite (14,16,18,22). This hypothesis has been advanced based on the clinical similarity between disulfiram and CS 2 neuropathy and the measurement of CS 2 and CS 2 metabolites in the breath and urine, respectively, following administration of disulfiram (23,24). CS 2 is a well-documented neurotoxicant that produces a central-peripheral distal axonopathy characterized by the formation of axonal swellings, degeneration, and atrophy (25,26).…”
Section: Disulfiram (Bis(diethylthiocarbamoyl)disulfide or Antabusementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon disulphide is present in the blood in normal subjects both as free and acid labile bound components. Brugnone et al . (1992) reported a median level of free carbon disulphide of 261 ng/l and acid labile levels of 636 ng/l.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach is represented by the measurement of CS 2 in blood where the compound exists partly in a free form while the majority is bound to amino acids or biological macromolecules, but can be released using acid and heat [Brugnone et al, 1992]. The use of bound CS 2 in blood for monitoring uptake during the working day appears less satisfactory than urinary TTCA, while CS 2 measurement in breath may only reflect exposure in the period just before sampling.…”
Section: Blood and Breath Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It seems reasonable to conclude that urinary CS 2 found in the general population should be considered to have derived in part from catabolic reaction of urine and partially from inhaled CS 2 present in polluted air. We remember that CS 2 is a natural, ubiquitous polluting agent derived from various natural sources such as volcanic activity, combustion of organic substances, biological processes, and industrial activity [Brugnone et al, 1992]. The influence of diet and particulary of cabbage consumption cannot be excluded, but at present there are no data on this issue.…”
Section: Confounding Factorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation