Blood Cell Separation Using Polypropylene-Based Microfluidic Devices Based on Deterministic Lateral Displacement

Abstract

Mammalian blood cell separation methods contribute to improving the diagnosis and treatment of animal and human diseases. Microfluidic deterministic lateral displacement (DLD) devices can sort cells based on their particle diameter. We developed microfluidic DLD devices with poly(propylene)-based resin and used them to separate bovine and human red blood cells (RBCs) and white blood cells (WBCs) without electric devices. To determine the critical cut-off diameter (Dc) of these devices, we used immunobeads with a diameter of 1–20 μm. The Dc values of the microfluidic DLD devices for the immunobeads in the experiments were similar to the calculated Dc values (8–10 μm). Results from bovine blood cell separation experiments suggest that lymphocytes and neutrophils can be separated from diluted, whole blood. Human RBCs were occasionally observed in the left outlet where larger particles with diameters closer to the Dc value were collected. Based on the Dc values, human neutrophils were sorted to the left outlet, whereas lymphocytes were observed in both outlets. Although microfluidic channel optimization is required for the concentration of sorted cells, the microfluidic DLD device prepared with a poly(propylene)-based resin has the potential for clinical use.

Microvortex-induced turbulent mixing for reconstitution of high-density lipoprotein-mimicking nanoparticles with aggregation-prone phosphatidylcholine

“…We fabricated base chips with the pattern and cover chips by injection molding at Richell Corporation (Toyama, Japan) using a resin exhibiting fine moldability. 15 The microfluidic chips were prepared by pressing the single-base chips and single-cover chips at 80 °C for 1 h. The microfluidic chips and tubing connectors were fixed together between acrylic plates. The microfluidic channel comprised three inlets, one mixing channel, five pre-outlets, and three outlets (Fig.…”

Breaking the clean room barrier: exploring low-cost alternatives for microfluidic devices

“…This trend has gained traction due to the distinct advantages of thermoplastics, including lower costs and faster production times, rendering them a viable option for scaling up production ( Becker & Gärtner, 2000 ; Tsao, 2016 ). Among the polymers that have gained significant usage in microfluidics are Polycarbonate (PC), Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), Polyimide (PI), Polypropylene (PP), Polystyrene (PS), Cyclic olefin copolymers (COC), and Poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) ( Denecke et al, 2022 ; Lee et al, 2022 ; Ortegón et al, 2022 ; Persson et al, 2022 ; Matsuura & Takata, 2023 ; Thaweeskulchai & Schulte, 2023 ).…”