2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20568-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood–brain barrier opening in a large animal model using closed-loop microbubble cavitation-based feedback control of focused ultrasound sonication

Abstract: Focused ultrasound (FUS) in combination with microbubbles has been established as a promising technique for noninvasive and localized Blood–brain barrier (BBB) opening. Real-time passive cavitation detection (PCD)-based feedback control of the FUS sonication is critical to ensure effective BBB opening without causing hemorrhage. This study evaluated the performance of a closed-loop feedback controller in a porcine model. Calibration of the baseline cavitation level was performed for each targeted brain locatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By demonstrating that smaller volume opening is possible in macaques we have improved the spatial selectivity of FUS BBB opening to smaller targets. Our system produced larger openings than a recent system tested in a porcine model which produced opening volumes from 3.8 to 53.6 mm 3 with a 500 kHz, 0.8 f-number transducer (Chien, Xu, et al 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By demonstrating that smaller volume opening is possible in macaques we have improved the spatial selectivity of FUS BBB opening to smaller targets. Our system produced larger openings than a recent system tested in a porcine model which produced opening volumes from 3.8 to 53.6 mm 3 with a 500 kHz, 0.8 f-number transducer (Chien, Xu, et al 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The geometric arrangement and frequency response of the cavitation monitor are known to be factors in sensitivity and could be improved upon to yield greater monitoring. A recent study in a porcine model achieved effective cavitation monitoring by tracking cavitation at the fourth harmonic of a 500 kHz transducer (2 MHz) (Chien, Xu, et al 2022). This approach used "dummy" signal captures following microbubble injection transmitted at 0.3 MPa to establish a baseline signal level at the fourth harmonic and tuned therapy pressures to increase the same signal metric relative to the baseline (Chien, Yang, et al 2022).…”
Section: Cavitation Monitoring Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the integration of the FUS device with cavitation detection enables the development of quality assurance for the FUS device and real-time monitoring for the treatment. Future work can integrate cavitation feedback control algorithms to regulate the FUS acoustic pressure in real-time 39, 40 , which would ensure precise and consistent delivery of the ultrasound energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo contrast-enhanced T 1 -weighted MRI scan (TR/TE: 20/5; slice thickness: 0.13 mm; in-plane resolution: 0.13 mm; matrix size: 120 × 240; ip angle: 20°) was performed to evaluate the outcome of FUS-BBBO based on the extravasation of the MRI contrast agent gadobenate dimeglumin (Gd-BOPTA; MultiHance, Bracco Diagnostics Inc., Monrow Township, NJ) from the blood circulation into brain tissue. BBBO volume was calculated by comparing the contrast-enhanced volume in the T 1 -weighted images on the FUS + side and FUS-side using a custom MATLAB script reported in our previous publications 10, [19][20][21] .…”
Section: Fus-bbbo Outcome Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%