2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blood biomarkers on admission in acute traumatic brain injury: Relations to severity, CT findings and care path in the CENTER-TBI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
172
4
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(32 reference statements)
11
172
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The average intra-plate CV of samples for NfL, GFAP, tau, UCHL1 was 7, 7, 16, and 31%, respectively. These CVs are consistent with other studies utilizing this assay [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The average intra-plate CV of samples for NfL, GFAP, tau, UCHL1 was 7, 7, 16, and 31%, respectively. These CVs are consistent with other studies utilizing this assay [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Local physicians and neurosurgeons are urged to act more vigorously in treating mTBI cases and even recommending rehabilitation programs to avoid future severe physical and long-term neuropsychological disabilities. To this end, blood-based biomarkers, increasingly being used worldwide, can represent a valuable tool to enhance the diagnostic process by enabling more accurate brain injury assessment [79-81]. Moreover, their integration in clinical algorithms can improve the existing decision criteria and guide subsequent management and treatment decisions including advanced neuroimaging, hospital admission, and long-term interventions (i.e., rehabilitation programs) [82, 83].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GFAP, measured within 24 hours following mTBI, was found to improve the prediction of CT abnormalities. 18 Although the combination of GFAP and UCH-L1 did not enhance this performance, compared with GFAP alone, 18 it should be noted that GFAP and UCH-L1 were measured within 24 hours after TBI using a research-use only assay with poor agreement between replicates of biomarker assessments. No cut-off values for GFAP or UCH-L1 were obtained or predefined in the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 14 A faster in vitro diagnostic (IVD) technique is then required for a possible use in clinical practice, together with an external validation of the diagnostic accuracy of GFAP and UCH-L1 in patients with mTBI. [15][16][17][18] Automated assays assessing serum concentrations of GFAP and UCH-L1 have been developed on the VIDAS platform (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the VIDAS GFAP and VIDAS UCHL-1 assays in a prospective multicentre cohort of patients with mTBI with respect to their brain CT scan findings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%