2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10606-016-9251-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bloggers’ Responses to the Snowden Affair: Combining Automated and Manual Methods in the Analysis of News Blogging

Abstract: The Snowden affair gave rise to a huge public debate about not only the legitimacy of the secret surveillance programs he revealed but also about Snowden himself and about the accuracy of the information he leaked. In this paper we present an analysis of how the affair was discussed in the English language blogosphere, based on a corpus of 15,000 blog posts written about Snowden and published from June 2013 to June 2014, as a sub-corpus of a larger corpus of 100,000 blog posts on the topic of surveillance, wri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most straightforward approach of most studies regarding valid interpretation of the resulting topics is to review the words with the highest probabilities for each topic (top words) and try to find a label describing the substantive content of the topic. Often, researchers also read through a sample of documents featuring high proportions of the respective topic (e.g., Elgesem, Feinerer, & Steskal, 2016;Jacobi et al, 2015;Koltsova & Shcherbak, 2015). These strategies are applied to ensure intra-topic semantic validity of topics as the most crucial aspect of semantic validity (Quinn, Monroe, Colaresi, Crespin, & Radev, 2010).…”
Section: Topic Interpretation and Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most straightforward approach of most studies regarding valid interpretation of the resulting topics is to review the words with the highest probabilities for each topic (top words) and try to find a label describing the substantive content of the topic. Often, researchers also read through a sample of documents featuring high proportions of the respective topic (e.g., Elgesem, Feinerer, & Steskal, 2016;Jacobi et al, 2015;Koltsova & Shcherbak, 2015). These strategies are applied to ensure intra-topic semantic validity of topics as the most crucial aspect of semantic validity (Quinn, Monroe, Colaresi, Crespin, & Radev, 2010).…”
Section: Topic Interpretation and Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis is performed automatically without human input, rendering a certain amount of topics, where the distribution represents the likelihood of the co-occurrence of different words. A threshold for likelihood that a document is actually about a certain topic was set based on (Elgesem et al, 2016) From this, topics rendered by the model are subject to human interpretation and coding, based on the word frequencies of each topic. Word co-occurrences like this often present as topics because many themes and issues (particularly news topics) have characteristic vocabularies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [5] presented an analysis about the discussion of the Snowden affair using a manual topic labelling approach. Guo et.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%