2020
DOI: 10.1109/mnet.001.1900151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BlockSDN: Blockchain-as-a-Service for Software Defined Networking in Smart City Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, a blockchain-based data auditing scheme integrated with the bi-linear pairing cryptographic mechanism was devised to ensure the data integrity. Meanwhile, Aujla et al [98] presented a framework of integrating SDN and blockchain to offer flexible network services. Particularly, blockchain-enabled SDN can mitigate the attacks such as malware and denial-of-service (DoS) attacks.…”
Section: B Network Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a blockchain-based data auditing scheme integrated with the bi-linear pairing cryptographic mechanism was devised to ensure the data integrity. Meanwhile, Aujla et al [98] presented a framework of integrating SDN and blockchain to offer flexible network services. Particularly, blockchain-enabled SDN can mitigate the attacks such as malware and denial-of-service (DoS) attacks.…”
Section: B Network Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential trust relationships of cloud-of-thing partners are exploited in [10] to improve the mutual trust and helpfulness between individual and group devices. In order to address open issues and challenges in smart city applications, a novel blockchain as a service framework, named BlockSDN, is proposed under software defined network-enabled architecture [12]. BlockSDN is considered to be an efficient solution which is able to contain various service attacks, including malware attack and distributed denial of service attack on compromised switch.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are many conventional blockchain frameworks like Bitcoin, IOTA, etc, but they have have some of the other implementation challenges. For example, Bitcoins requires high computing resources to run proof of work consensus mechanism [7] whereas IOTA end up in higher latency while adding new transactions [22]. Hence, such architectures are not suitable in a IoT-based in-home monitoring systems supported by edge computing.…”
Section: B Lightweight and Decoupled Blockchain Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%