2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2014.10.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blocks of small defect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a fixed prime p, the fundamental Ito–Michler theorem asserts that p does not divide χ(1) for any χ Irr (G) if and only if G has a normal abelian Sylow p‐subgroup. This result has been generalized in . In particular, the authors in studied the finite groups G in which p2doesnotdivideanyirreduciblecharacterdegree.For arbitrary groups G, it is shown that false|G/Opfalse(Gfalse)|p is bounded by p4 when p3 (see ), and by p3 when p=2 (see ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For a fixed prime p, the fundamental Ito–Michler theorem asserts that p does not divide χ(1) for any χ Irr (G) if and only if G has a normal abelian Sylow p‐subgroup. This result has been generalized in . In particular, the authors in studied the finite groups G in which p2doesnotdivideanyirreduciblecharacterdegree.For arbitrary groups G, it is shown that false|G/Opfalse(Gfalse)|p is bounded by p4 when p3 (see ), and by p3 when p=2 (see ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Not much has been done on this problem. In a recent paper [24,Theorem B], the author obtained a partial result toward the previous question by showing the following. Let G be a finite solvable group, let p be a prime such that p ≥ 5 and O p (G) = 1, and we denote |G| p = p n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Assume that p ≥ 5. The proof of [20,Theorem 3.2] already show that G has a p-regular orbit on V , a contradiction. Therefore p = 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence e > 1. Since G has no regular orbit on V , it follows by [20,Theorem 3.1] that e = 2, 3, 4, 8, 9 or 16.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%