Abstract:A recent study of nonextensive phase transitions in nuclei and nuclear clusters needs a probability model compatible with the appropriate Hamiltonian. For magnetic molecules a representation of the evolution by a Markov process achieves the required probability model that is used to study the probability density function (PDF) of the order parameter, i.e. the magnetization. The existence of one or more modes in this PDF is an indication for the superparamagnetic transition of the cluster. This allows us to det… Show more
“…For he spin model we will consider two cases, firstly we consider a system consisting of a single large spin, typically used in connection with nano-magnets, and indicated by LS. Secondly we will consider the many spin system, typically used to calculate the blocking temperature [3] or other phase-transitions [9,10,11,12], and indicated by MS. For the M/M/∞-queue we will use the maximum entropy principle to show that it is able to distinguish between different initial conditions. Furthermore we will calculate the Shannon entropy of the queue and of the "quantum" model equivalent to the queue and show that the entropies have completely different behavior with respect to β .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ref. [3], we compared the PDF of magnetization based on the assignment (1) with the PDF based on the Markov representation and we found that they are different. In order to indicate the possible origin of this difference we briefly indicate the steps necessary to achieve the Markov representation.…”
Section: The Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mapping and references to the physical origin of the model can be found in the paper: [3]. The second system is an M/M/∞ -queue.…”
Section: The Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the Hamiltonian is rewritten in terms of spin lowering and raising operators, the generator Q for the continuous time Markov process can be calculated using the techniques which are documented in ref. [3]. Casting the Markov representation of ( 6) into a matrix equation: ∂ βK (β ) =QK(β ), and straightforward matrix methods can be used to obtain K m m ′ (β ).…”
Abstract. The evolution of a quantum system, appropriate to describe nano-magnets, can be mapped on a Markov process, continuous in β . The mapping implies a probability assignment that can be used to study the probability density (PDF) of the magnetization. This procedure is not the common way to assign probabilities, usually an assignment that is compatible with the von Neumann entropy is made. Making these two assignments for the same system and comparing both PDFs, we see that they differ numerically. In other words the assignments lead to different PDFs for the same observable within the same model for the dynamics of the system. Using the maximum entropy principle we show that the assignment resulting from the mapping on the Markov process makes less assumptions than the other one.Using a stochastic queue model that can be mapped on a quantum statistical model, we control both assignments on compatibility with the Gibbs procedure for systems in thermal equilibrium and argue that the assignment resulting from the mapping on the Markov process satisfies the compatibility requirements.
“…For he spin model we will consider two cases, firstly we consider a system consisting of a single large spin, typically used in connection with nano-magnets, and indicated by LS. Secondly we will consider the many spin system, typically used to calculate the blocking temperature [3] or other phase-transitions [9,10,11,12], and indicated by MS. For the M/M/∞-queue we will use the maximum entropy principle to show that it is able to distinguish between different initial conditions. Furthermore we will calculate the Shannon entropy of the queue and of the "quantum" model equivalent to the queue and show that the entropies have completely different behavior with respect to β .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ref. [3], we compared the PDF of magnetization based on the assignment (1) with the PDF based on the Markov representation and we found that they are different. In order to indicate the possible origin of this difference we briefly indicate the steps necessary to achieve the Markov representation.…”
Section: The Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mapping and references to the physical origin of the model can be found in the paper: [3]. The second system is an M/M/∞ -queue.…”
Section: The Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the Hamiltonian is rewritten in terms of spin lowering and raising operators, the generator Q for the continuous time Markov process can be calculated using the techniques which are documented in ref. [3]. Casting the Markov representation of ( 6) into a matrix equation: ∂ βK (β ) =QK(β ), and straightforward matrix methods can be used to obtain K m m ′ (β ).…”
Abstract. The evolution of a quantum system, appropriate to describe nano-magnets, can be mapped on a Markov process, continuous in β . The mapping implies a probability assignment that can be used to study the probability density (PDF) of the magnetization. This procedure is not the common way to assign probabilities, usually an assignment that is compatible with the von Neumann entropy is made. Making these two assignments for the same system and comparing both PDFs, we see that they differ numerically. In other words the assignments lead to different PDFs for the same observable within the same model for the dynamics of the system. Using the maximum entropy principle we show that the assignment resulting from the mapping on the Markov process makes less assumptions than the other one.Using a stochastic queue model that can be mapped on a quantum statistical model, we control both assignments on compatibility with the Gibbs procedure for systems in thermal equilibrium and argue that the assignment resulting from the mapping on the Markov process satisfies the compatibility requirements.
“…Since S > 1/2 there is an underscreened Kondo effect, the development of which is hampered by the anisotropy as has been shown by timedependent numerical renormalization group. 17 As the quantum character of the macrospin is not accounted for by simple Langevin dynamics, 7 different approaches [18][19][20] have been suggested to treat the macro-or many-spin dynamics in contact with bosonic baths by means of quantum master-equation approaches and to determine, e.g., the blocking temperature. The importance of a manyspin model, for example, is demonstrated by studies of the probability density function of the macrospin obtained by replacing thermal with Markov processes.…”
The thermal activation of magnetization reversal in magnetic nanoparticles is controlled by the anisotropy-energy barrier. Using perturbation theory, exact diagonalization and stability analysis of the ferromagnetic spin-s Heisenberg model with coupling or single-site anisotropy, we study the effects of quantum fluctuations on the height of the energy barrier. Opposed to the classical case, there is no critical anisotropy strength discriminating between reversal via coherent rotation and via nucleation/domain-wall propagation. Quantum fluctuations are seen to lower the barrier depending on the anisotropy strength, dimensionality and system size and shape. In the weak-anisotropy limit, a macrospin model is shown to emerge as the effective low-energy theory where the microscopic spins are tightly aligned due to the ferromagnetic exchange. The calculation provides explicit expressions for the anisotropy parameter of the effective macrospin. We find a reduction of the anisotropy-energy barrier as compared to the classical high spin-s limit.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.