2015
DOI: 10.1089/dna.2015.2896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blocking Respiratory Syncytial Virus Entry: A Story with Twists

Abstract: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is responsible for majority of infant hospitalizations due to viral infections. Despite its clinical importance, no vaccine against RSV or effective antiviral therapy is available. Several structural classes of small-molecule RSV entry inhibitor have been described and one compound has advanced to clinical testing. Mutations in either one of two resistance hot spots in the F protein mediate unusual pan-resistance to all of these inhibitor classes. Based on the biochemical char… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, recent mapping of resistance mutations (61) and cocrystallization of structurally different inhibitor classes with the RSV fusion (F) protein (62) spotlighted a defined microdomain located at the base of the prefusion RSV F protein head domain as the common docking site. Analogous to our prediction for the different HA inhibitor classes, all RSV compounds tested engage the same F microdomain, but different avenues exist to productively populate the target (60,62,63). Viral resistance against current therapeutics constitutes a major driving force for the development of novel influenza virus inhibitors; clinical use of the adamantanes is no longer advised, and preexisting resistance increasingly compromises the neuraminidase inhibitors (11,22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, recent mapping of resistance mutations (61) and cocrystallization of structurally different inhibitor classes with the RSV fusion (F) protein (62) spotlighted a defined microdomain located at the base of the prefusion RSV F protein head domain as the common docking site. Analogous to our prediction for the different HA inhibitor classes, all RSV compounds tested engage the same F microdomain, but different avenues exist to productively populate the target (60,62,63). Viral resistance against current therapeutics constitutes a major driving force for the development of novel influenza virus inhibitors; clinical use of the adamantanes is no longer advised, and preexisting resistance increasingly compromises the neuraminidase inhibitors (11,22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Second, a bias toward interaction of small-molecule screening hits with viral glycoproteins and the presence of a single predominant target site is not entirely unprecedented for small-molecule drug screens against myxovirus family members. A number of anti-RSV HTS campaigns were conducted in recent years that likewise yielded entry inhibitors at a high frequency (60). The molecular target site of these chemically diverse compound classes was originally discussed controversially.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Firstly, several hot spots have been identified that mediate universal escape from inhibition by all advanced RSV entry inhibitors tested, despite the structural diversity of the different chemotypes [68]. The existence of these pan-resistance sites suggests that it may be challenging to proactively counteract viral escape through synthetic scaffold optimization [69]. Supporting this notion, a large-scale high-throughput drug screen using a recombinant RSV strain carrying a signature pan-resistance mutation did not return any hits blocking F protein activity, although entry inhibitors typically emerge readily and are often pharmacodominant in anti-RSV drug screens [70,71].…”
Section: Synthetic F Protein Blockersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). The F protein then folds back in on itself to bring the viral and target membranes together causing membrane fusion [136][137][138][139][140]. Initial work on designing antibodies and small molecules against the F protein were hampered by the multiple confirmations the protein forms; indeed, targeting the post-fusion F protein form had little clinical benefit.…”
Section: F Proteinmentioning
confidence: 99%