1976
DOI: 10.3758/bf03335083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blocking in children from two socioeconomic levels

Abstract: The subjects. 108 4-year-old children from two socioeconomic levels. were trained on a three-phase simultaneous discrimination task. In Phase 1, stimulus element A was reinforced; stimulus element B was held constant. In Phase 2. element B was reinforced on all trials; element A was available and reinforced on 100o~, 75%, or 50% of the trials and held constant on the remaining trials. In Phase 3. the two elements were tested separately. conjunctively. and disjunctively. Lower socioeconomic subjects (a) perform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…102 Classic operantconditioning studies on new association acquisition showed that low-SES children tend to perseverate using the same "losing" strategy at testing when preexposed with random chaotic reinforcement. 103,104 Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that cognitive flexibility may be dependent on DA availability in the PFC. 83,84 Consequently, the presence of persistent LI may be due to challenges with cognitive flexibility, since late filtering in selective attention allows an information overflow, which may lead to unconscious associations that are difficult to break (overinclusive thinking).…”
Section: Working Memory and Cognitive Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…102 Classic operantconditioning studies on new association acquisition showed that low-SES children tend to perseverate using the same "losing" strategy at testing when preexposed with random chaotic reinforcement. 103,104 Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that cognitive flexibility may be dependent on DA availability in the PFC. 83,84 Consequently, the presence of persistent LI may be due to challenges with cognitive flexibility, since late filtering in selective attention allows an information overflow, which may lead to unconscious associations that are difficult to break (overinclusive thinking).…”
Section: Working Memory and Cognitive Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Underdeveloped cognitive flexibility is linked to perseveration errors, or repeating strategies that were successful in the past but are no longer effective . Classic operant‐conditioning studies on new association acquisition showed that low‐SES children tend to perseverate using the same “losing” strategy at testing when preexposed with random chaotic reinforcement . Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that cognitive flexibility may be dependent on DA availability in the PFC .…”
Section: Internal Buffersmentioning
confidence: 90%