OFC/NFOEC 2007 - 2007 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference 2007
DOI: 10.1109/ofc.2007.4348779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blocking and Waveband Assignment in WDM Networks with Limited Reconfigurability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative approach to analytically predicting lightpath blocking with the intra-node contention is a novel contribution of this paper. As mentioned in general in [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], this would be more desirable for the design and planning of networks as analytical methods not only give results faster and more conveniently than simulations, they would also allow a better understanding of the underlying behavior of the system. This has been attempted, for the first time in this paper, for ROADM nodes with intra-node contention.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative approach to analytically predicting lightpath blocking with the intra-node contention is a novel contribution of this paper. As mentioned in general in [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43], this would be more desirable for the design and planning of networks as analytical methods not only give results faster and more conveniently than simulations, they would also allow a better understanding of the underlying behavior of the system. This has been attempted, for the first time in this paper, for ROADM nodes with intra-node contention.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies in [35] evaluated the performance of wavelength-routed optical networks both with and without wavelength conversion capability where the number of wavelengths per link and the number of add/drop ports per node are limited. Subramiam et al [36] also examined the limitations from add/drop ports and their tunabilities. They also compared the performance between the cases of Share-Per-Link (SPL, the ports are dedicated to each link) and Share-Per-Node (SPN, all the links at a node share a pool of ports) in [36].…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the case of LTTs if the terminal nodes of a lightpath request do not have transponders that can tune to the same waveband, then that lightpath cannot be established. In [5], we proposed algorithms for assigning wavebands to transponders so that they share more common wavebands and these methods were shown to reduce the blocking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that paper, all the L-ROADMs are identical in that they all can add/drop from the same band of wavelengths. Other related work on limited reconfigurability has appeared in [5] [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%