Blockchain technology in pharmaceutical supply chains: a transaction cost perspective

Abstract

PurposeAdopting new technologies to improve supply chain activities and processes is essential due to increasingly complex and dynamic business environments. Particularly in the pharmaceutical industry, high-quality standards must be met, requiring transparency and visibility in the supply chain. This research aims at investigating the implementation of blockchain technology in the supply chain of an Egyptian pharmaceutical company.Design/methodology/approachThe research applies a single case-study approach building on the theoretical underpinnings of transaction cost economics. Twenty-five semistructured interviews were conducted with pharmacies and employees of the case company to identify the blockchain technologies' potential for pharmaceutical supply in Egypt. Further analyzing the frequencies of the codes, the authors elaborate on specific relationships between the observed practices.FindingsThe research revealed the potential benefits of adopting blockchain technology. Transaction costs are indeed positively impacted by reduced contracting costs, processing costs and lead times, also ensuring the safe delivery of medications. However, the findings also highlight obstacles related to running costs, awareness and company culture. Regarding supply chain governance, blockchain technology can enhance collaboration within the supply chain as well as with important stakeholders.Practical implicationsInsufficient management of pharmaceutical supply chains (PSC) may affect a company's reputation but also disrupt the patient's healing process due to temperature damage and counterfeit medicines. Blockchain governance, in this vein, can ensure a safer and more reliable supply of pharmaceutical products. For intraorganizational purposes, however, cloud solutions, barcoding and generally digital platforms are rated more frequently than blockchain solutions.Originality/valueThe present study contributes to an advanced understanding how blockchain technology supports PSC, particularly in an emerging country context like Egypt. It thereby confirms and extends previous research as well as adds to the theoretical underpinnings of digitalized supply chains.

Modeling the enablers of blockchain technology implementation for information management in healthcare supply chains

“…The integrity of all transactions is auditable to all participants, with conforming verification of trust. Blockchain implementation across healthcare supply chains will ensure healthcare information integrity and trustworthiness (Gruchmann et al. , 2023).…”

Digital Transformation in Toxicology: Improving Communication and Efficiency in Risk Assessment

“…By using digital tools, toxicologists can streamline the process of collecting and analyzing data, collaborate more effectively with colleagues and stakeholders, and provide more accurate and timely assessments of the risks posed by chemicals and other substances. One example of the practical application of blockchain technologies in toxicology is the use of predictive modeling to assess the toxicity of chemicals . Predictive models can be developed using large data sets and machine learning algorithms to predict the toxicity of chemicals based on their chemical structure and other properties.…”

“…One example of the practical application of blockchain technologies in toxicology is the use of predictive modeling to assess the toxicity of chemicals. 63 Predictive models can be developed using large data sets and machine learning algorithms to predict the toxicity of chemicals based on their chemical structure and other properties. This approach can significantly reduce the time and cost associated with traditional toxicity testing methods, while also providing more accurate predictions.…”

Barriers to Applying Last-Mile Logistics in the Egyptian Market: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model

“…Financial factors stand out as one of the core barriers to adoption. The cost of implementing last-mile is not convincing, which may hamper the backing and commitment of the stakeholders [77]. Implementation expenses may diverge because of numerous profound influences, including hardware, software systems, enrollment, and in-community preparation.…”