Blockchain Integration with end-to-end traceability in the Food Supply Chain

Bansal, Lakshya; Chaurasia, Shefali; Sabharwal, Munish; Vij, Mohit

doi:10.1109/icacite53722.2022.9823514

Cited by 5 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, topics such as the importance of Sustainable Development and proposals related to Sustainable Development Goals made a notable contribution. (Yontar, 2023); (S. ; (S. ; (R. Gupta & Shankar, 2023); (P. ; (Chandan et al, 2023); (Mohammed et al, 2023); (S. Patidar et al, 2023); (Rajput et al, 2023); (Kayikci et al, 2022); (Rejeb et al, 2022); (Agnusdei & Coluccia, 2022); (Collart & Canales, 2022); (Khan et al, 2022); (Saha et al, 2022); (S. Dey et al, 2022); (Rejeb et al, 2022); (Yakubu et al, 2022); (Wunsche et al, 2022); (Hassoun et al, 2022); (P. Kumar et al, 2022); (Guruswamy et al, 2022); (Scuderi et al, 2022); (Bansal et al, 2022); (Vostriakova et al, 2022); (Rezaei & Babazadeh, 2022); (Sharma et al, 2020); (Galanakis et al, 2021); (Antonucci et al, 2019); (Pearson et al, 2019); (Tsolakis et al, 2021); (Gopi et al, 2019); (Barbosa, 2021); (Patra et al, 2021); (A. Patidar et al, 2021); (Cruz & De Arruda Ignacio, 2023); (Srhir et al, 2023); (Tanwar et al, 2022); Kumar et al, 2023); (R. Gupta & Shankar, 2023); (S. Patidar et al, 2023);…”

Section: Development and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Patidar et al, 2021); (Cruz & De Arruda Ignacio, 2023); (Srhir et al, 2023); (Tanwar et al, 2022); Kumar et al, 2023); (R. Gupta & Shankar, 2023); (S. Patidar et al, 2023); (Kayikci et al, 2022); (Wunsche et al, 2022); (Rogerson & Parry, 2020); (Hew et al, 2020); (Kazancoglu et al, 2022); (Maity et al, 2021); (Phua et al, 2021); Modelling (Yontar, 2023); (Bhatia & Albarrak, 2023); (M. Kumar et al, 2023); (S. ; (S. Patidar et al, 2023); (Rajput et al, 2023); (Khan et al, 2022); (Lee et al, 2021); (Scuderi et al, 2022); (Bansal et al, 2022); (Luo et al, 2022); (Li et al, 2022); (Kamble et al, 2020); (Prashar et al, 2020); (Yadav & Singh, 2020); (Phua et al, 2021); (Runzel et al, 2021); (Yang et al, 2020); (Abdulhussein et al, 2020); (Patra et al, 2021); (AlJemy et al, 2019); (A. Patidar et al, 2021) Technical (Bhatia & Albarrak, 2023); (Khan et al, 2022); (D. Kumar et al, 2017); (Lee et al, 2021); (Bansal et al, 2022); (Prashar et al, 2020);…”

Section: Development and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Following this, Table 3 is presented, displaying the Research Approach, which allowed for the organization of all the identified research in this study. Monitoring and Supervising (Bhatia & Albarrak, 2023); (R. Gupta & Shankar, 2023); (Rajput et al, 2023); (Khan et al, 2022); (Yakubu et al, 2022); (Lee et al, 2021); (Scuderi et al, 2022); (Bansal et al, 2022); (Luo et al, 2022); (Kazancoglu et al, 2022); (Abdulhussein et al, 2020); (Patra et al, 2021); (AlJemy et al, 2019);…”

Section: Development and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

From Linear to Circular: A Novel Approach of Integration of Blockchain in Agri-Food Chains and the SCOR Model Oriented to Logistics Reverse and Sustainable Development Goals

Cruz,

De Arruda Ignacio

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

⦁ Introduction: The challenging context, resulting from a post-pandemic scenario, wars, and various natural disasters, does not allow for the ideal assurance of efficiency in the Agri-food supply chain. ⦁ Research significance Currently, Agri-food supply chains and Reverse logistics show critical characteristics such as centralization, limited flexibility, distrust, bureaucratization, Border and Documentary Compliance and there are problems about efficiency, security, and safety Agri-Food. using the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) framework, with the purpose of achieving Sustainable Development Goals, promoting transparency, traceability, and non-linearization of the agri-food supply chain. ⦁ Methodology The methodology is combined, the first part uses Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) identifying 72 articles with the principal contribution in the literature. The second part combines the application of Supply Chain Operations References (SCOR) and the Blockchain Technology aiming to decentralize the linear Agri-food Supply Chain and Reverse logistics. ⦁ Results/findings The results revealed a transformation of the traditional Agri-food Supply Chain, transitioning from linear management to a circular one. Additionally, after application it is possible to know a new way to manage the Reverse Logistic with more decentralization, flexibility, traceability, and reducing the unnecessary activities, which include Border and Documentary Compliance. The originality of this research is the novel combination of SCOR Model and Blockchain showing a priority about the key activities that add value and come close to the Sustainable practices. ⦁ Conclusion / Implications Based on the results is possible to conclude that the synergy between Blockchain and SCOR Model enables a new way to manage the Agri-food supply chain, improving efficiency and reducing activities without value. Also, it is possible to ensure that the practices of Reverse Logistics are improved based on terms of cost and time, and the reduction of the exposition on the Defective Product Risk. ⦁ Social Implications This paper could enhance confidence in all operations of the Agri-food supply chain as there are numerous issues regarding the security and safety of food. Additionally, it will aid in diminishing unnecessary activities and inefficient resource consumption practices, thereby accomplishing objectives 2 "zero hunger", 9 "Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure", and 12 "Responsible consumption and production", along with their respective indicators. ⦁ Practical implications Regarding the practical implications, this research could contribute to analyses of the application of technology Blockchain in different sectors and identify the possible limitations when the main objective is to apply it on a big scale.

show abstract

Section: Development and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Development and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Development and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

From Linear to Circular: A Novel Approach of Integration of Blockchain in Agri-Food Chains and the SCOR Model Oriented to Logistics Reverse and Sustainable Development Goals

Cruz,

De Arruda Ignacio

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In terms of technical problems, BT has scalability issues [98,170,171] due to the heavy computing required. Ethereum can only process 15 transactions per second, which is a very low rate when compared to other financial authorities, demonstrating the scalability concerns with blockchain [172]. Although one of the most cutting-edge methods in the food sector is BT, the design and development of the suggested systems take a lot of time and effort [95].…”

Section: The Uses Benefits and Challenges Of Blockchain Technology Fo...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Food and Agriculture Industries: Despite its many benefits, the real implementation of blockchain in the agricultural food supply chain is still in its infancy [79,153,180,264]. Much research should be done to use it to create reliable and secure decentralized apps [172]. Unvalidated sustainable e-agriculture implementation and noninformalized sustainable analysis are still understudied as developing themes [106].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This study presents a comprehensive review of blockchain technology with a sustainability orientation in supply chains and logistics. Methods: The publications are extracted from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, comprising 552 publications between 2017 and 2022. Several bibliometric laws and techniques, namely three-field analysis, Bradford’s Law, Lotka’s Law, and thematic maps, are applied in R with the bibliometrix package. Content analysis is also carried out based on 185 publications to appreciate the industry-based view of the field. Results: The bibliometric results indicate that this field is on the rise. Authors, sources, affiliations, countries, keywords, and their relationships are also addressed. The findings of the content analysis and thematic maps reveal that some of the most highlighted themes in the literature include traceability, COVID-19, the internet of things, and Industry 4.0. The most popular industry in this field is discovered to be food and agriculture. Conclusions: This paper contributes to the still relatively scarce literature on how blockchain technology fosters sustainable supply chains and logistics, providing a closer look at blockchain use, methodologies, and future directions for different industries concerning food, agriculture, fashion, textile and apparel, manufacturing, automotive, maritime and shipping, healthcare and pharmaceutical, mining and mineral, and energy.

show abstract

Back to a resilient future: Digital technologies for a sustainable supply chain

Winkelmann,

Guennoun,

Möller

et al. 2024

Inf Syst E-Bus Manage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Economic, political, and societal pressure forces companies to act more sustainably. New legislation and regulation such as the Supply Chain Act, mandates companies to take responsibility for their actions as well as those of their supply chain collaborators. Meeting these requirements demands transparency. Digital technologies along the supply chain have the potential to collect diverse types of data and raise awareness for sustainability purposes. For example, data obtained from multiple supply chain participants can be used to estimate CO2 emissions or optimize resource utilization. Following guidelines for systematically reviewing a body of literature, this paper therefore investigates the distribution of digital technologies in supply chains for sustainability. Based on a collected corpus of 70 articles, we identify seven key digital technologies and indicate how they can be employed to contribute to economic, environmental, and social sustainability. The results show that (1) blockchain is the most used technology for sustainability within the supply chain and (2) the majority of articles on digital technologies in our corpus address the social dimension of sustainability. Our findings advance the understanding of how digitalization can transform supply chains into more sustainable entities and help practitioners decide which technology fits a certain sustainability dimension.

show abstract

Blockchain Integration with end-to-end traceability in the Food Supply Chain

Cited by 5 publications

References 19 publications

From Linear to Circular: A Novel Approach of Integration of Blockchain in Agri-Food Chains and the SCOR Model Oriented to Logistics Reverse and Sustainable Development Goals

From Linear to Circular: A Novel Approach of Integration of Blockchain in Agri-Food Chains and the SCOR Model Oriented to Logistics Reverse and Sustainable Development Goals

Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach

Back to a resilient future: Digital technologies for a sustainable supply chain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About