Blockchain Consensus: An Overview of Alternative Protocols

Abstract

Blockchain networks are based on cryptographic notions that include asymmetric-key encryption, hash functions and consensus protocols. Despite their popularity, mainstream protocols, such as Proof of Work or Proof of Stake still have drawbacks. Efforts to enhance these protocols led to the birth of alternative consensus protocols, catering to specific areas, such as medicine or transportation. These protocols remain relatively unknown despite having unique merits worth investigating. Although past reviews have been published on popular blockchain consensus protocols, they do not include most of these lesser-known protocols. Highlighting these alternative consensus protocols contributes toward the advancement of the state of the art, as they have design features that may be useful to academics, blockchain practitioners and researchers. In this paper, we bridge this gap by providing an overview of alternative consensus protocols proposed within the past 3 years. We evaluate their overall performance based on metrics such as throughput, scalability, security, energy consumption, and finality. In our review, we examine the trade-offs that these consensus protocols have made in their attempts to optimize scalability and performance. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper that focuses on these alternative protocols, highlighting their unique features that can be used to develop future consensus protocols.

The Application of Blockchain in Social Media: A Systematic Literature Review

“…In addition, to these, there are other popular mechanisms, including consensus proofs such as Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS), Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT), and Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET). In addition to the conventional blockchain consensus protocols, other alternative protocols have been proposed in recent years for specific applications, such as Proof of Familiarity (PoF), Proof of Benefit (PoB), Proof of Participation and Fees (PoPF), Proof of Vote (PoV), CHB, and CHBD; others for more general-purpose use include Proof of Reputation (PoR), Proof of Reputation X (PoRX), Proof of Phone (PoP), Proof of Learning (PoL), Proof of Search (PoSe), Proof of Sincerity (PoSn), Proof of Adjourn (PoAj), Proof of Evolution (PoE), Proof of Experience (PoEx), and Proof of Accuracy (PoA) [25].…”

Blockchain-Empowered Digital Twins Collaboration: Smart Transportation Use Case

“…Furthermore, collaboration means sharing and exchange information among entities and share tasks to act accordingly. Blockchain technology is beneficial for DTs collaboration to (1) maintain the trust among peer to peer network [10], which DTs represent, (2) allow traceability across the entire DTs network [7], (3) provide insightful consensus-based decision-making process [80], and (4) deliver efficient solutions by utilizing the decentralization feature of blockchain technology [81]. Additionally, with a decentralized infrastructure of physical nodes represented in DTs, the blockchain particularly, DLT technologies can help relieve the risk of the point of failure.…”

Trust Model Concept for IoT Blockchain Applications as Part of the Digital Transformation of Metrology

“…Consequently, the data in any given block cannot be tampered with without altering all subsequent blocks. Of course, it is doable, but various consensus mechanisms are defined to make it too risky and unprofitable [1,2].…”