2018 IEEE 23rd International Workshop on Computer Aided Modeling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/camad.2018.8514954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blockchain-based Electronic Patient Records for Regulated Circular Healthcare Jurisdictions

Abstract: Circular, data-driven healthcare is increasingly being considered as an effective model to provide efficient, cost-effective and sustainable healthcare services in the future. Central to this model is the service-dominant "building-block"-type provision of care services to patients, paired with the collaboration of healthcare providers through a common infrastructure. This combination enables the forming of a decentralized, holistic care cycle. Sharing of patient medical information is pivotal towards reaching… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Alexaki et al describe a solution for regulated circular healthcare jurisdictions using the blockchain and smart contract technologies. Such a solution has the potential to contribute to more modular and interoperable healthcare services as well as to enable circularity by providing the necessary collaborating mechanism [86].…”
Section: Data Management and Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alexaki et al describe a solution for regulated circular healthcare jurisdictions using the blockchain and smart contract technologies. Such a solution has the potential to contribute to more modular and interoperable healthcare services as well as to enable circularity by providing the necessary collaborating mechanism [86].…”
Section: Data Management and Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the research reviewed focused on blockchain’s use to strengthen HIT security or patients’ privacy during health data exchange or access; 53% (37/70) papers focused on addressing patients’ lack of control over the privacy and security of their data [ 10 - 46 ], and 40% (28/70) papers addressed blockchain’s ability to prevent data tampering [ 10 , 12 , 21 , 25 , 33 , 34 , 37 , 38 , 40 - 44 , 46 - 60 ]. Data breaches were addressed in 37% (26/70) papers [ 15 , 18 , 19 , 22 , 24 , 29 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 36 - 38 , 43 , 44 , 54 , 56 - 66 ], 9% (6/70) papers mentioned malicious attacks (eg, impersonation) that blockchain could potentially resolve [ 17 , 34 , 44 , 56 , 60 , 67 ], and 4% (3/70) papers focused on how blockchain can preserve patients’ anonymity while third parties accessed their health and medical records for activities such as medical research [ 41 , 42 , 68 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is challenging to keep track of all data and ensure its immutability in the context of complex medical cases that require multiple diverse activities, patients’ visits, and providers’ treatments [ 17 ]. Blockchain-based MIMS facilitate the creation of immutable records with traceable transactions that cannot be changed over time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project achieved this using FHIR profiles as a computational conformance scheme. Figure 15 shows the details of this distribution and others like older versions of HL7 [63], [65], [69], [75], [77], [80], [95], [123], Logical Observations Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) [30], [53], [65], [95], [165], World Health Organisation's (WHO's) International Classification of Diseases (ICD) [53], [65], [95], [130], International Organization for Standards (ISO) [95], Systematised Nomenclature of Medicine -Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) [59], [95], Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) [65], [95], [114], Open Electronic Health Records (OpenEHR) [95], [106], [115]. OmniPHR [95] for instance uses a translator hosted as a super-peer (blockchain node) in the blockchain network.…”
Section: ) Standards or Ontologies Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others mentioned once in reviewed papers are Integrating Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) [95], [114], [123], Institute of Electrical Electronics Engineers (IEEE) [65], XML Document Transform (xDT), CDMA [28], International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) [53], CARRE [70], International Organization for Standards (ISO) Technical Committee 251 (TC251) [65], ISO13606 [106], European Committee for Standards (CEN) [95], Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) [59], Online Mendelian Inheritance of Man (OMIM) [59], Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [59], Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) [95], Systematised Nomenclature of Dentistry (SNODENT) [135].…”
Section: ) Standards or Ontologies Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%