The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1093/ijlit/eay014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blockchain and smart contracts: the missing link in copyright licensing?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, smart contracts became a central feature of Blockchain technology [4]. These software-based contracts enforced by the Blockchain can include specific conditions for sale or licensing [2,3]. Moreover, they enable property rights to be verified automatically [17].…”
Section: Benefits Of Using Blockchain For Ip Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, smart contracts became a central feature of Blockchain technology [4]. These software-based contracts enforced by the Blockchain can include specific conditions for sale or licensing [2,3]. Moreover, they enable property rights to be verified automatically [17].…”
Section: Benefits Of Using Blockchain For Ip Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, access conditions previously stipulated by licensing are embedded in the resource itself. Technologies such as encryption, hashing and blockchain create a record of ownership and provenance of any resource, and the conditions related to access of the resource are recorded either indirectly, through means of access controls, or directly, by means of a smart contract (Bodó, Gervais, & Quintais, 2018). .…”
Section: Content-based Addressing Is Importantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Однако следует проявлять определенную осторожность, поскольку контракты часто используются для исключения изъятий и защиты в отношении авторских прав (например, при извлечении текстов и данных) 135 . Эффективное нарушение мо- 134 См., например: Football League Premier Division v. British Telecommunications plc [2017] EWHC480 (ch); Cartier v. British Sky Broadcasting Ltd [2018] UKSC28.…”
Section: прорывной потенциал блокчейна в сфере авторского праваunclassified