Blockade of NMDA receptors increases cell death and birth in the developing rat dentate gyrus

Abstract

Excitatory input regulates cell birth and survival in many systems. The granule cell population of the rat dentate gyrus is formed primarily during the postnatal period. Excitatory afferents enter the dentate gyrus and begin to form synapses with granule cells during the first postnatal week, the time of maximal cell birth and death. In order to determine whether excitatory input plays a role in the regulation of cell birth and survival in the developing granule cell layers and their germinal regions, the subependymal layer and hilus, we treated rat pups with the N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists MK-801, CGP 37849, or CGP 43487 during the first postnatal week and examined the numbers of 3H-thymidine-labeled cells, pyknotic cells, and healthy cells in these regions. In order to determine the cell type that was affected, sections from brains of MK-801-treated rats were processed for 3H-thymidine autoradiography combined with immunohistochemistry for the marker of radial glia, vimentin, and the marker of mature astrocytes, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Within the dentate gyrus, NMDA receptor blockade resulted in the following changes: (1) the density of 3H-thymidine-labeled cells was increased, (2) the density of pyknotic cells was increased, (3) the density of 3H-thymidine-labeled pyknotic cells was increased, and (4) the density of healthy cells was decreased. The infrapyramidal blade/hilus showed changes throughout its extent, whereas the suprapyramidal blade showed changes only at the rostral level. No change in the numbers of 3H-thymidine-labeled vimentin-immunoreactive or GFAP-immunoreactive cells was observed in the dentate gyrus with MK-801 treatment, indicating that glia are not primarily affected by NMDA receptor blockade. Blockade of NMDA receptors resulted in gross morphologic changes in the dentate gyrus; in most cases, the infrapyramidal blade was indistinguishable from the hilus. Moreover, in several brains of animals treated with CGP 37849 or CGP 43487 on postnatal day (P)5, an abnormal aggregation of cells was observed ventral to the normal location of the infrapyramidal blade. This cellular cluster contained many pyknotic and 3H-thymidine-labeled cells and may represent cells that normally comprise the infrapyramidal blade. Dramatic changes to the subependymal layer were also seen following NMDA receptor blockade. The cross-sectional area of this region was significantly increased with MK-801, CGP 37849, or CGP 43487 treatment and contained a high density of 3H-thymidine-labeled cells and 3H-thymidine-labeled pyknotic cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Why New Neurons? Possible Functions for Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis

“…Only after several studies had confirmed the early reports by Altman and Das (1965) and Kaplan and Hinds (1977) that adult hippocampal neurogenesis indeed occurs, and after improved methods had been introduced to quantitatively identify new neurons with relative ease (Kuhn et al, 1996), did questions of function become imminent. The first studies, particularly the work by Bruce McEwen's group, focused on the negative regulators of adult hippocampal neurogenesis (Gould et al, 1992(Gould et al, , 1994, especially severe stress (Gould et al, 1997). In contrast, our own findings that living in an enriched environment led to a robust increase in adult hippocampal neurogenesis indicated that adult hippocampal neurogenesis might indeed be regulated in relation to normal behavior (Kempermann et al, 1997(Kempermann et al, , 1998a.…”

Role of the ubiquitin–proteasome system in brain ischemia: Friend or foe?

“…These data indicate that NMDAR, characterized by their high Ca 2+ permeability, are the link between glutamate, Ca 2+ and neuronal cell death. On the other hand, it was shown that blocking NMDAR with MK-801 decreases the density of healthy cells in the dentate gyrus (Gould et al, 1994), indicating that a moderate flow of Ca 2+ ions through NMDAR is beneficial for neurons, while Ca 2+ overload, linked with an excessive NMDAR activation, is deleterious (NMDAR paradox) (Hardingham and Bading, 2003).…”

Histaminergic Neurons Protect the Developing Hippocampus from Kainic Acid-Induced Neuronal Damage in an Organotypic Coculture System

“…Moreover, the application of histamine (100 M) to brain slices containing striatal neurons has resulted in a concentrationdependent, NMDA receptor-mediated neuronal swelling, ultimately leading to H 2 receptor-mediated neuronal death (Colwell and Levine, 1997). Although the exact intracellular mechanisms mediating the neurotoxic effect of high histamine concentrations are poorly known, the effects mediated through NMDA receptors could be of importance, because the normal NMDA receptor function is of crucial importance for neuronal survival in the immature hippocampus (Gould et al, 1994;Katz and Shatz, 1996;Ben-Ari, 2001;Manent et al, 2005), and any disturbances may enhance neuronal damage.…”