1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1986.tb10175.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blockade of Ca‐activated K conductance by apamin in rat sympathetic neurones

Abstract: 1 Effects of apamin on rat sympathetic neurones were investigated by means of intracellular and extracellular recording. 2 Apamin (50 nM) significantly shortened the after-hyperpolarization (AH) following the spike evoked by current injection and slightly decreased its peak amplitude without affecting the time course of the spike. 3 The AH following the synaptically-evoked spike was also blocked by apamin. This effect was doseand time-dependent (ID50 estimated by extracellular recording approximately 15 nM, 20… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
50
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-axotomized rat sympathetic ganglion cells do not show ADPs (McAfee & Yarowsky, 1979;Kawai & Watanabe, 1986;Kawai & Watanabe, 1989;Sanchez-Vives & Gallego, 1993a), which is in accordance with the lack of inward tail currents in control cells bathed in 'ITX and TEA, even after increasing the current driving force by lowering the external Cl-concentration. Therefore, as discussed by Sanchez-Vives & Gallego (1993a), a new conductance appears at or near the cell body after axotomy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Non-axotomized rat sympathetic ganglion cells do not show ADPs (McAfee & Yarowsky, 1979;Kawai & Watanabe, 1986;Kawai & Watanabe, 1989;Sanchez-Vives & Gallego, 1993a), which is in accordance with the lack of inward tail currents in control cells bathed in 'ITX and TEA, even after increasing the current driving force by lowering the external Cl-concentration. Therefore, as discussed by Sanchez-Vives & Gallego (1993a), a new conductance appears at or near the cell body after axotomy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Even in the presence of apamin (20 nm, n = 4), which blocks the slow AHP in these cells (Kawai & Watanabe, 1986), no ADPs were revealed by trains of spikes or depolarizing pulses (not shown). We tried to evoke the 'ADP in normal cells (n = 5) in the same conditions that we used to study the current in axotomized neurons: in the presence of TTX and TEA to block sodium and potassium currents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This apparent absence of the apamin-sensitive, low conductance, CaZ+-activated K + channel accords with the ineffectiveness of apamin in the mammalian hippocampus [14,18], as distinct from the PNS of both amphibians and mammals [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Apamin inhibits the small conductance, Ca2+-dependent, voltage-insensitive K + channel [12] which appears to underlie the slow afterhyperpolarization that controls repetitive firing in the PNS [16,17]. By analogy, the slow after-hyperpolarization in the CNS may also be mediated by such low conductance channels although no apamin sensitivity has yet been reported therein ( [14,18]; but see [19]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is likely to be the Ic current (Dryer et al, 1991). Apamin is known to suppress the Ik(Ca) involved in the after-hyperpolarization of the action potential but not the Ih(Ca) involved in the repolarization of the action potential in autonomic neurones (Tanaka et al, 1986;Kawai & Watanabe, 1986;Dryer et al, 1991). Taken together with the present observations that show NO can depress both apamin and charybdotoxin-sensitive Ik(Ca) at times comparable to that of the repolarization phase of the action potential at about 5 ms (Dryer et al, 1991), it seems likely that both the Ic current involved in the repolarization of the action potential as well as the apamin-sensitive current involved in the after-hyperpolarization are depressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%