2020
DOI: 10.1177/1471082x20963254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Block models for generalized multipartite networks: Applications in ecology and ethnobiology

Abstract: Generalized multipartite networks consist in the joint observation of several networks implying some common pre-specified groups of individuals. Such complex networks arise commonly in social sciences, biology, ecology, etc. We propose a flexible probabilistic model named Multipartite Block Model (MBM) able to unravel the topology of multipartite networks by identifying clusters (blocks) of nodes sharing the same patterns of connectivity across the collection of networks they are involved in. The model paramet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea behind these models is very general and could be extended to other types of networks. In ecology, bipartite and multipartite networks are common and the model extension (Govaert and Nadif, 2003;Bar-Hen et al, 2020) is straightforward (although some additional modeling choices arise when considering π-colSBM , δ-colSBM or δπ-colSBM ), the main difficulty would then lie in the algorithmic part. Additionally, incorporating the type of ecological interaction as a network covariate (Mariadassou et al, 2010) would help us understand its impact on the structure of the networks and to the robustness of the ecosystems they depict (Chabert-Liddell et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea behind these models is very general and could be extended to other types of networks. In ecology, bipartite and multipartite networks are common and the model extension (Govaert and Nadif, 2003;Bar-Hen et al, 2020) is straightforward (although some additional modeling choices arise when considering π-colSBM , δ-colSBM or δπ-colSBM ), the main difficulty would then lie in the algorithmic part. Additionally, incorporating the type of ecological interaction as a network covariate (Mariadassou et al, 2010) would help us understand its impact on the structure of the networks and to the robustness of the ecosystems they depict (Chabert-Liddell et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variational EM algorithm is theoretically grounded (Bickel et al, 2013) and has proven its pratical efficiency (Daudin et al, 2008;Mariadassou et al, 2010). In practice for the inference of these models, we use the blockmodels R package (Leger, 2015) and to handle missing observations the GREMLINS R package (Bar-Hen et al, 2020), both available on CRAN .…”
Section: Analysis Of a Collection Of Observed Bipartite Ecological Ne...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Allesina and Pascual (2009) has advocated for the use of groups in ecological networks, SBMs (sometimes referred to as group models) have gained in popularity. Some variants adapted to multilayer ecological networks have been proposed: for multiplex networks (Kéfi et al, 2016), multipartite networks (Bar-Hen et al, 2020) or temporal networks (Matias et al, 2017). Besides, they have been used to answer specific ecological questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Allesina and Pascual (2009) has advocated for the use of groups in ecological networks, SBMs (sometimes referred to as group models) have gained in popularity. Some variants adapted to multilayer ecological networks have been proposed for: multiplex networks (Kéfi et al, 2016), multipartite networks (Bar-Hen et al, 2020) or temporal networks (Matias & Miele, 2017). Besides, they have been used to answer specific ecological questions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%