2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Block freeze concentration assisted by centrifugation applied to blueberry and pineapple juices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
78
12

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
20
78
12
Order By: Relevance
“…A progressive increase in the percentage of concentrate was observed after the concentration cycles for orange juice and reached 60%, which was close to the values reported in the literature [21,32]. This work of the percentage of concentrate is similar to the value (approximately 50%) reported by Bonilla-Zavaleta et al [16] for centrifugal assisted cryoconcentrated pineapple juice and is similar to the general 50% concentrate obtained by block freeze concentration [15].…”
Section: Efficiency and Percentage Of Concentratesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A progressive increase in the percentage of concentrate was observed after the concentration cycles for orange juice and reached 60%, which was close to the values reported in the literature [21,32]. This work of the percentage of concentrate is similar to the value (approximately 50%) reported by Bonilla-Zavaleta et al [16] for centrifugal assisted cryoconcentrated pineapple juice and is similar to the general 50% concentrate obtained by block freeze concentration [15].…”
Section: Efficiency and Percentage Of Concentratesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…During the third cycle, the efficiency decreased, and the solids content in the ice augmented to 12 ∘ Brix. These results were better than those obtained previously in our laboratory [21], where the solids concentration increase of 2.5 and 2.7 times was obtained after the third freeze concentration cycle of blueberry and pineapple juices, respectively. This difference can be explained because, in the present study, differently sized tubes were used (45 ml versus 12 ml), which could provoke some stratification or movement of the solids in the freezing step that favors later separation.…”
Section: Solute Content In the Concentrated Solution And Icecontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations