2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Block copolymer micelles for drug delivery: Design, characterization and biological significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
861
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 905 publications
(889 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
9
861
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…28-30 Besides the thick PEG shell of micelles, the surface charge of CPT/m determined as ζ-potential at pH 7.4 was found to be close to neutral (+0.26 mV), which is a significant advantage for avoiding the adsorption of charged biomolecules and extending the half-life in the bloodstream. [16][17][18]31 The loading of CPT in the micelles was controlled from 7.50 to 16.3 w/w % (weight of drug/weight of polymer: w/w) ( Table 1), as determined by UV-Vis spectrophotometer. By increasing the [CPT]/[COOH] feed ratio from 1 to 2, the loading of the micelles was practically doubled (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28-30 Besides the thick PEG shell of micelles, the surface charge of CPT/m determined as ζ-potential at pH 7.4 was found to be close to neutral (+0.26 mV), which is a significant advantage for avoiding the adsorption of charged biomolecules and extending the half-life in the bloodstream. [16][17][18]31 The loading of CPT in the micelles was controlled from 7.50 to 16.3 w/w % (weight of drug/weight of polymer: w/w) ( Table 1), as determined by UV-Vis spectrophotometer. By increasing the [CPT]/[COOH] feed ratio from 1 to 2, the loading of the micelles was practically doubled (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, combination of PCI with endosomally internalized nanomedicines that specifically release their cargo in response to cytosolic conditions could be an effective approach for augmenting spatiotemporal control of the nanomedicine's functions, and simultaneously evolve into applicable light-activated therapies. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 4 Core-shell block copolymer micelles incorporating therapeutic agents in their core have demonstrated outstanding features as nanomedicines in both preclinical and clinical studies, [16][17][18] including their adaptable drug release in response to specific stimuli by directly engineering the bond between the drugs and the core-forming segment of the block copolymers. [16][17][18] We have previously developed polymeric micelles exploiting disulfide bonds in their core for specifically acting under the reductive conditions of the cytosol, [19][20][21] which shows 100-to 1000-fold higher glutathione (GSH) concentration than those in blood and extracellular milieu (Scheme 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because they can encapsulate guest molecules in their interior, hollow spheres have great potential for applications such as drug storage and delivery (Kataoka et al 2012), separation (Wang et al 1998), adsorbents, microreactors (Vriezema et al 2005), catalysts (Lu et al 2015), supercapacitors (Liu et al 2014), and medical examination and diagnosis (Salata 2004). Methods for the fabrication of hollow spheres have been extensively reported, including template synthesis (Liu and Basu 2009), self-assembly (Breitenkamp and Emrick 2003), emulsion polymerization (Jang and Ha 2002), core removal of dendrimers (Zimmerman et al 2002), and direct polymerization reaction (Kim et al 2010); however, the most commonly used raw materials are synthetic polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, nanoparticles may be engineered to combine two or more of these therapies, leading to synergistic anticancer efficacy [14][15][16]. Although numerous nanoparticles have been developed as carriers for imaging and therapeutic agents, the majority can be categorized into either pure inorganic [e.g., quantum dots (QDs) [17], metallic nanostructures (gold nanoparticles) [18], and metal oxides (particularly magnetic iron oxides [19], up-conversion nanophosphors [20], and zeolites [21])] or organic materials (e.g., liposomes [22], dendrimers [23], micelles [24], and polymeric hydrogel nanoparticles [25]). Each of these classes of nanoparticles has its own strengths and weaknesses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%