A17. Treatment of Pah 2009
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2009.179.1_meetingabstracts.a1042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blinded, Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Tadalafil in Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, there are long-term data for treatment durability at the FDA-approved dose for tadalafil. 13 It is anticipated that because of these benefits, many patients and clinicians may choose transition from sildenafil to tadalafil therapy. However, there is little reported clinical experience in converting patients from sildenafil to tadalafil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there are long-term data for treatment durability at the FDA-approved dose for tadalafil. 13 It is anticipated that because of these benefits, many patients and clinicians may choose transition from sildenafil to tadalafil therapy. However, there is little reported clinical experience in converting patients from sildenafil to tadalafil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical trials of tadalafil and ambrisentan have shown differences in outcomes in patients receiving placebo that were not improved by subsequent treatment during the time frame examined. (5,6)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical trials of tadalafil and ambrisentan have shown differences in outcomes in patients receiving placebo that were not improved by subsequent treatment during the time frame examined. (5,6) Although treatment guidelines summarize current knowledge of therapeutic approaches to PAH, based on scientific rigor and evidence from available clinical trials (7,8), the optimal treatment of patients or patient groups is not known. True evidence based recommendations and guidelines could really only be derived from head to head comparison of agents and sequences of treatment, unlikely given the rare nature of the disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%