2018
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sty863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blinded by the light: on the relationship between CO first overtone emission and mass accretion rate in massive young stellar objects

Abstract: To date, there is no explanation as to why disc-tracing CO first overtone (or 'bandhead') emission is not a ubiquitous feature in low-to medium-resolution spectra of massive young stellar objects, but instead is only detected toward approximately 25 per cent of their spectra. In this paper, we investigate the hypothesis that only certain mass accretion rates result in detectable bandhead emission in the near infrared spectra of MYSOs. Using an analytic disc model combined with an LTE model of the CO emission, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the CO ro-vibrational emission in the wavelength range ∼ 2.25-2.45 µm observed in a few HAeBes is probably coming from the innermost disk regions, based on spectral modelling (see, e.g., Carr 1989;Bik & Thi 2004;Ilee et al 2014). However, none of the five stars in our sample show signatures of CO emission in the GRAVITY data, which is in agreement with the low detection rate in HAeBes (Ilee et al 2014(Ilee et al , 2018. In fact, spatially resolved interferometric observations of CO are only available for one HAeBe star to date (see the works on 51 Oph by Tatulli et al 2008;GRAV-ITY Collaboration et al 2020), which prevents us from making a comparative study.…”
Section: Inner Gas Probed Through Spectro-interferometrysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In particular, the CO ro-vibrational emission in the wavelength range ∼ 2.25-2.45 µm observed in a few HAeBes is probably coming from the innermost disk regions, based on spectral modelling (see, e.g., Carr 1989;Bik & Thi 2004;Ilee et al 2014). However, none of the five stars in our sample show signatures of CO emission in the GRAVITY data, which is in agreement with the low detection rate in HAeBes (Ilee et al 2014(Ilee et al , 2018. In fact, spatially resolved interferometric observations of CO are only available for one HAeBe star to date (see the works on 51 Oph by Tatulli et al 2008;GRAV-ITY Collaboration et al 2020), which prevents us from making a comparative study.…”
Section: Inner Gas Probed Through Spectro-interferometrysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Interestingly, the only source of the sample without signs of the CO bandheads (G301.8147) shows the strongest Brγ emission. Increasing accretion rates (e.g., stronger Brγ; see, Mendigutía et al 2011) or evolutionary stage (Cooper 2013;Cooper et al 2013) are known to influence the detection rate of the CO bandheads towards MYSOs (Ilee et al 2018b).…”
Section: G301mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carr 1989;Ishii et al 2001;Connelley & Greene 2010;Cooper et al 2013). A plausible reason for this low detection rate, at least in the case of HMYSOs, is that the CO emission seems to be sensitive to the mass accretion rate (Ṁ acc ) of the system; because this rate A&A 633, A128 (2020) is a moderate value ofṀ acc ∼ 10 −5 M yr −1 it best produces the most prominent CO emission (Ilee et al 2018). Therefore, adding objects with CO detection represents both a challenge and an important contribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%