2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind Trust: How Making a Device Humanoid Reduces the Impact of Functional Errors on Trust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social human-robot interaction has explored the use of priming, or a variant called framing ( Westlund et al, 2016 ; Sanoubari et al, 2018 ; Liu, 2020 ; Wallkötter et al, 2020 ) in social interactions between people and social robots. More generally, it has been argued for some time that user expectations and perceptions are crucial for shaping their expectations and willingness to interact with autonomous social robots ( Lindgaard et al, 2006 ; Mitra and Golder, 2006 ; Young et al, 2009 ; Edwards et al, 2019 ; Reich-Stiebert et al, 2019 ; Vattheuer et al, 2020 ). In the priming direction, some work has shown how subtle shifts in language used to describe a robots can influence how personal ( Coeckelbergh, 2011 ) or human-like ( Anna et al, 2012 ) people view or treat the robots ( Sam and Tom, 2017 ).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social human-robot interaction has explored the use of priming, or a variant called framing ( Westlund et al, 2016 ; Sanoubari et al, 2018 ; Liu, 2020 ; Wallkötter et al, 2020 ) in social interactions between people and social robots. More generally, it has been argued for some time that user expectations and perceptions are crucial for shaping their expectations and willingness to interact with autonomous social robots ( Lindgaard et al, 2006 ; Mitra and Golder, 2006 ; Young et al, 2009 ; Edwards et al, 2019 ; Reich-Stiebert et al, 2019 ; Vattheuer et al, 2020 ). In the priming direction, some work has shown how subtle shifts in language used to describe a robots can influence how personal ( Coeckelbergh, 2011 ) or human-like ( Anna et al, 2012 ) people view or treat the robots ( Sam and Tom, 2017 ).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%