2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2014.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind source mobile device identification based on recorded call

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of the audio revealed no dominant harmonicity, fundamental frequencies nor reliable temporal envelope descriptions. Zero crossing and spectral shape statistics required a minimum signal level above the noise-floor to be of any use as an input to a machine learning classifier [8]. In other words, peak levels at -50 dBFS and average levels around -72 dbFS in our 16-bit system corresponded to a very low dynamic range and a minimum signal-to-noise ratio, which limited the signal analysis options.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyses of the audio revealed no dominant harmonicity, fundamental frequencies nor reliable temporal envelope descriptions. Zero crossing and spectral shape statistics required a minimum signal level above the noise-floor to be of any use as an input to a machine learning classifier [8]. In other words, peak levels at -50 dBFS and average levels around -72 dbFS in our 16-bit system corresponded to a very low dynamic range and a minimum signal-to-noise ratio, which limited the signal analysis options.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our specific task with "dead air" audio, we know of only one related effort, which focused on mobile device identification using Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) features. To account for the absence of an audible speech signal, Jahanirad et al computed the entropy of the Mel-cepstrum, discovering that sections of "silent" signal resulted in high-valued entropy-MFCC features which were effective in discriminating between different mobile device models [8]. This work suggests there are characteristic features of a source device or the transmission channel even in the absence of a speech signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, establishing the source of audio or multimedia evidence in the court of law increases the authenticity of the evidence [2,3]. This is because digital audio technology, at present, has facilitated the processing, manipulation and editing of audio by using sophisticated tools and software without leaving any perceptible trace [4]. Furthermore, knowing recording device characteristics has the potential to help other critical speech applications such as speech recognition and speaker verification by normalizing recording devices' variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aggarwal et al [14] proposed an MFCC feature extraction from an estimated noisy region of the speech. Jahanirad et al [4,15] investigated the use of entropy of Mel-cepstrum coefficients from near-silent segments. Anshan et al [16] used device self-noise estimated from the silent segments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing literature related to this problem focus on microphone identification [4][5][6][7][8][9], telephone handset identification [3,[10][11][12][13][14][15] and cell phone identification [15][16][17][18][19][20]. In particular, source cell phone recognition from speech recordings was first pointed out by Hanilçi et al [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%