2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 2004. ICIP '04.
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2004.1418853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind source camera identification

Abstract: An interesting prohlem in digital forensics is that given a digital image, would it he possihle to identify the camera model which was used to obtain the image. In this paper we look at a simplified version of this problem by trying to distinguish between images captured by a limited number of camera models. We proposc i number of features which could be used by a classifier to idcntify the source camera of an image in a blind manner. We also provide experimental results and show reasonable accuracy in disting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
172
0
3

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
2
172
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Each image was divided into 512 × 512 non-overlapping blocks of which eight were randomly chosen * 2.0 * * * * 5.7 * 20.2 * * * 1.2 * 69. 8 for analysis. The image database consisted of 4,600 different images with 512 × 512 resolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Each image was divided into 512 × 512 non-overlapping blocks of which eight were randomly chosen * 2.0 * * * * 5.7 * 20.2 * * * 1.2 * 69. 8 for analysis. The image database consisted of 4,600 different images with 512 × 512 resolution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researchers have employed multi-class classifiers for camera identification [1,4,8,11,14]. The methodology involves extracting feature vectors from several image samples created by various camera models.…”
Section: Combined Classification Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[37,33].Some of the existing approaches are classification based [6,22]. Unfortunately, the outcome of these algorithms is often hard to interpret for nontechnical surveyors, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%