ICECS'99. Proceedings of ICECS '99. 6th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (Cat. No.99EX357)
DOI: 10.1109/icecs.1999.812314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind signal separation and speech recognition in the frequency domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This recognition, as well as the Signal to Interference Ratio (SIR) results [8], although promising for the field of speech recognition, showed a certain incompetence in performing efficiently due to the stochastic nature of the gradient descent optimization technique that was used. Furthermore, the convergence behavior of the above optimization methods depends on the step size choice and the initial separation filter coefficient values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This recognition, as well as the Signal to Interference Ratio (SIR) results [8], although promising for the field of speech recognition, showed a certain incompetence in performing efficiently due to the stochastic nature of the gradient descent optimization technique that was used. Furthermore, the convergence behavior of the above optimization methods depends on the step size choice and the initial separation filter coefficient values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Therefore, this last matrix can be written by means of the Z transform as Several ICA-based algorithms can be applied in this case to carry the separation process out. In the context of audio, the convolutive problem is classically analysed by means of second order statistics (Ehlers & Schuster, 1997;Ikram & Morgan, 2001;Kawamoto et al, 1999;Sahlin & Broman, 1998;Weinstein et al, 1993), higher order statistics (Charkani & Deville, 1999;Jutten et al, 1991b;Nguyen et al, 1992;Nguyen & Jutten, 1995;Van Gerven et al, 1994) and probability density function Koutras et al, 1999;Lee et al, 1997a;.…”
Section: Blind Implicit Source Separation -A New Concept In Bss Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods have been used in the published literature to indicate separation performance. The list includes mean-square-error (MSE) [20], [21] bit per symbol error rate [22], [23], Frobenius distance [24], multichannel row and multichannel column intersymbol interference (ISI) [25], plot of global mixing filter responses [26]- [28], signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) [29]- [31], interference-to-signal ratio (ISR) [19], signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) [32]- [38], one-at-a-time SIR [8], ISI [39]- [41], bias and standard deviation of filter coefficients [42], [43], plot of estimated sources in the time or frequency domain [44]- [46], hand-segmented SIR [47], automatic speech recognition rate [48], [33], [34], and the mean opinion score [18]. Several of these are not ideal for comparisons because they are either subjective, such as the plots and the mean opinion score, or require knowledge of the mixing filters, which makes them inapplicable for real mixtures.…”
Section: Figures Of Merit For Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%