MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001. An Ocean Odyssey. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37295)
DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2001.968337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind receivers for MSK signals transmitted through shallow water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CPM has not been widely used in UWA communication. Weber discussed the feasibility of blind equalization for MSK UWA communication [ 20 ]. Vadde [ 21 ] and Liu [ 22 ] studied MSK and GMSK signals for UWA communication, respectively, and employed the virtual time-reversal mirror to suppress multipath interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CPM has not been widely used in UWA communication. Weber discussed the feasibility of blind equalization for MSK UWA communication [ 20 ]. Vadde [ 21 ] and Liu [ 22 ] studied MSK and GMSK signals for UWA communication, respectively, and employed the virtual time-reversal mirror to suppress multipath interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed multichannel fractionally-spaced adaptive equalizer together with subsequent phase control is obviously able to reduce an initial BER of above 20% to values well below 1% without any prior training. Furthermore, the convergence towards these low BER values is very fast, especially when compared to the widely used CMA [14]. This is also reflected by the mean-square error (MSE) between the signals prior and after the slicer, which is a measure for the residual ISI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the number of equalizer taps shall be finite, the equality requirement in (8) Observing that under Theorem 1, Itl$(ItltC;vX$)t 3ct C; v = I, it should be evident that solving the least-squares problem (1 1) together with subsequent normalization (14) is equivalent to one step of the iteration (8) to (9).…”
Section: [ G I L N = ( [ S L H + N -L I ] N ) M L ( ( [ S L H + N -mentioning
confidence: 99%