2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2009.4959628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind Monte Carlo detection-estimation method for optical coherence tomography

Abstract: We consider the parametric analysis of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) signals. A Monte Carlo (Gibbs sampler) detection-estimation method for determining the depths and reflection coefficients of tissue interfaces (reflective sites in the tissue) is proposed. Our method is blind since it estimates the instrumentationdependent "fringe" function along with the tissue parameters. Sparsity of the detected interfaces is enforced by an impulse detector and a modified Bernoulli-Gaussian prior with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each realization of x, we generated a Markov chain according to each of the four sampler algorithms. Detection and estimation were performed as in [2]. The result of one such simulation run (corresponding to one realization of x) is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For each realization of x, we generated a Markov chain according to each of the four sampler algorithms. Detection and estimation were performed as in [2]. The result of one such simulation run (corresponding to one realization of x) is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This example is relevant to several signal processing applications (e.g., [2]). For reasons that will become clear later, the binary sequence is now denoted by b k , rather than by θ k .…”
Section: Application Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations