2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2016.7472216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind mobile sensor calibration using an informed nonnegative matrix factorization with a relaxed rendezvous model

Abstract: To cite this version:Clément Dorffer, Matthieu Puigt, Gilles Delmaire, Gilles Roussel. Blind mobile sensor calibration using an informed nonnegative matrix factorization with a relaxed rendezvous model. 41st IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2016) ABSTRACTIn this paper, we consider the problem of blindly calibrating a mobile sensor network-i.e., determining the gain and the offset of each sensor-from heterogeneous observations on a defined spatial area over time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work opens many perspectives. We recently proposed some mobile sensor calibration techniques based on informed matrix factorization [12], [13], [14]. In future work, we will investigate some outlier-robust extensions of these approaches, using a similar low-rank modeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This work opens many perspectives. We recently proposed some mobile sensor calibration techniques based on informed matrix factorization [12], [13], [14]. In future work, we will investigate some outlier-robust extensions of these approaches, using a similar low-rank modeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the sensors are mobile, they can be in rendezvous, i.e., they are in the same spatio-temporal neighborhood, thus sensing the same phenomenon [6]. Such an assumption was recently used 1 in both micro- [8], [9], [10] and macro-calibration 2 [12], [13], [14]. However, in the case of fixed sensors, other assumptions are needed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the blind calibration problem can be tackled by informed Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (NMF). We propose to that end four informed NMF techniques which were partially and preliminarily proposed in [17], [18]. In [17], we were showing how to write the calibration problem in an informed NMF framework while we extended it in [18] by adding some sparse assumptions in one column of one matrix factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When radiation changes after the coupling phase, the correction co-efficient does not fit the situation anymore and causes larger errors. However, as point (n) indicates, there is no clear difference between stations with open (Stations 1-5) and slightly obscuring surroundings (Stations [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. In December, there are no significant differences between RMSE values at different station groups due to the low intensity of the SW radiation.…”
Section: Station Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic calibration methods are thus used to eliminate the cumbersome and error-prone manual calibration [8]. One such automatic calibration method is the rendezvous model [9][10][11][12]. In the rendezvous model, observations by two or more sensors, mobile or stationary, are collected when the sensors are co-located, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%