2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2018.11.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind image quality assessment with semantic information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that human judgments of visual video quality are strongly influenced by the different sensitivity to low-level visual features [ 31 , 32 ] and the semantic video content [ 33 , 34 ], in this work we characterize video frames in terms of these two aspects. To this end, we employ two CNNs that we have called Extractor-Q and Extractor-S to extract low-level quality and semantic features, respectively.…”
Section: The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that human judgments of visual video quality are strongly influenced by the different sensitivity to low-level visual features [ 31 , 32 ] and the semantic video content [ 33 , 34 ], in this work we characterize video frames in terms of these two aspects. To this end, we employ two CNNs that we have called Extractor-Q and Extractor-S to extract low-level quality and semantic features, respectively.…”
Section: The Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that human judgments of visual video quality are strongly influenced by the different sensitivity to low-level visual psychological characteristics [ 27 , 34 ] and the semantic video content [ 25 , 26 ] in this work we characterize video frames in terms of these two aspects. To this end, we employ two CNNs that we have called Extractor-Q and Extractor-S to extract quality and semantic features, respectively.…”
Section: The Quality and Semantics Aware Video Quality Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we focus on the problem of assessing the quality of videos affected by distortions introduced during the capture process. The proposed method relies on the rationale that human judgments of visual video quality depend on: the semantic content [ 25 , 26 ], the different sensitivity to low-level visual psychological characteristics [ 27 ], and the temporal-memory effects [ 11 ]. Image regions presenting clear semantic information are more sensitive to the presence of impairments, consequently they may be judged as more annoying by humans as they hinder the content recognition [ 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network training on different metrics that were introduced for quality estimation. In [22], the authors have presented the quality of the images using structural semantics and spatial semantics. This was introduced to remove the quality of images by efficient noise removals.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%