2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2016.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind image quality assessment with improved natural scene statistics model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed methodology is compared with 11 state-of-the-art NR-IQA techniques, namely DIIVINE [2], BLINDS II [25], BRISQUE [27], BIQI [24], CORNIA [26], M3 [1], improved NSS [18], SA _ IQA [29], S [31], and SLKR [31]. Table 2 shows the individual performance comparison of the proposed methodology for the LIVE, TID2008, and CSIQ databases, which validates the better performance of the proposed method.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed methodology is compared with 11 state-of-the-art NR-IQA techniques, namely DIIVINE [2], BLINDS II [25], BRISQUE [27], BIQI [24], CORNIA [26], M3 [1], improved NSS [18], SA _ IQA [29], S [31], and SLKR [31]. Table 2 shows the individual performance comparison of the proposed methodology for the LIVE, TID2008, and CSIQ databases, which validates the better performance of the proposed method.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The proposed method also reduces the execution time by more than 25.2% when compared to DIIVINE. The proposed method takes a longer time to compute the quality score than BIQI [24], CORNIA [26], BRISQUE [27], M3 [1], curveletQA [3], SSEQ [4], improved NSS [18], SA _ IQA [29], S [31], and SLKR [31], but gives better performance in terms of average SROCC and LCC to predict the MOS.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most BIQA techniques extract features, which are altered in the presence of distortion [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. Features are extracted either in spatial domain, wavelet domain, and discrete cosine transform (DCT) domain or using edge information of image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most existing works focus on the measuring stage, where quality-aware features are designed to measure the level of image distortion. These features are usually based on the natural scene statistics (NSS) [32][33][34][35], assuming that pristine natural images have particular statistical properties that are disturbed by the distortions. NSS-based methods can extract features in different domains, such as discrete cosine transform (DCT) domain [36][37][38], discrete wavelet transform (DWT) domain [39][40][41], spatial domain [42], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%