2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2957235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind Image Quality Assessment of Natural Distorted Image Based on Generative Adversarial Networks

Abstract: Most existing image quality assessment (IQA) methods focus on improving the performance of synthetic distorted images. Although these methods perform well on the synthetic distorted IQA database, once they are applied to the natural distorted database, the performance will severely decrease. In this work, we propose a blind image quality assessment based on generative adversarial network (BIQA-GAN) with its advantages of self-generating samples and self-feedback training to improve network performance. Three d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And the superiority of the method was verified in TID2008 and TID2013 datasets. The same year, Yang et al (2019) designed a BIQA method with the advantages of self-generated samples and self-feedback training, called BIQA-GAN. GAN-based methods have the ability to learn local distortion characteristics and whole quality on the depth features of the image, and it can accomplish the mapping fitting of potential features to the target domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the superiority of the method was verified in TID2008 and TID2013 datasets. The same year, Yang et al (2019) designed a BIQA method with the advantages of self-generated samples and self-feedback training, called BIQA-GAN. GAN-based methods have the ability to learn local distortion characteristics and whole quality on the depth features of the image, and it can accomplish the mapping fitting of potential features to the target domain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 shows the performance metrics of the proposed approach. For proper evaluation, the proposed method is compared with full reference (FR), reduced reference (RR), and no reference (NR) methods [29,30]. The deep learning-based no-reference method is also considered for performance comparison.…”
Section: Evalution Of Image Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the performance of the EPL method based on the most proper amount of initial training data is compared with the most advanced NR-IQA methods, including: classical NR-IQA methods (BLIINDSS [30], BRISQUE [28], BWS [5], CORNIA [31], GMLOG [51], IL-NIQE [6], and FRIQUEE [34]), and DNN-based NR-IQA methods (CNN [12], RankIQA [23], BIECON [20], DIQaM [17], DIQA [22], CaHFI [52], NRVPD [53], ESD [54], VS-DDON [55], NQS-GAN [56], and ILGNet [57]). This method was also compared with the well-known DNN models, AlexNet [10], ResNet50 [48], and VGG-16 [26], which were modeled using the LIVEC database.…”
Section: Evaluation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared with using only hand-crafted features, the combined strategy outperforms. In addition, compared with the end-to-end deep learning methods (CNN [12], RankIQA [23], BIECON [20], DIQaM 17], DIQA [22], CaHFI [52], NRVPD [53], ESD [54], VS-DDON [55], NQS-GAN [56], and ILGNet [57]), since the above algorithms are mostly directed to synthetic distortion, the learning of the authentic distortion features is insufficient. Consequently, although it has not been adjusted by the IQA database, the proposed method is still superior to all the methods.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%