2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2014.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind image clustering based on the Normalized Cuts criterion for camera identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduce computational time and maintaining accuracy, with the number of cameras and images are increased digest-based descriptor is taken into account [13], [14]. Open set scenario is depicted in [15], [16] using enhanced version of PRNU to distinguish among images taken by unknown digital cameras. Extracting robust and characterizing features to distinguish among various classes of originating devices like scanned images, photos, and computer.…”
Section: ©Ijraset (Ugc Approved Journal): All Rights Are Reservedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduce computational time and maintaining accuracy, with the number of cameras and images are increased digest-based descriptor is taken into account [13], [14]. Open set scenario is depicted in [15], [16] using enhanced version of PRNU to distinguish among images taken by unknown digital cameras. Extracting robust and characterizing features to distinguish among various classes of originating devices like scanned images, photos, and computer.…”
Section: ©Ijraset (Ugc Approved Journal): All Rights Are Reservedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the infeasibility of the manner of determining the optimal cluster number in [31], Amerini et al [45] proposed a blind SPN clustering algorithm based on normalized cut criterion [46]. Similar to [31], SPNs are considered as the vertices in a graph and the weight of each edge measures the similarity between the two vertices connected by the edge.…”
Section: The Challenges Of Source-oriented Image Clustering and Relatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the advantages of our proposed algorithm, we compared it with other five clustering methods: (1) the multi-class spectral clustering (SC) method [31], (2) the hierarchical clustering (HC) method [34], (3) the shared nearest neighbor clustering (SNNC) method [43], (4) the normalized cut-based clustering (NCUT) method [45], and (5) the Markov random field based clustering (MRF) method [49]. We did not include Boly's algorithm [44] and Marra's algorithm [47], because both algorithms retain the fingerprints in the RAM for updating the centroids of clusters, which makes them unsuitable for relatively large datasets.…”
Section: Comparisons and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another interesting scenario that has received some attention in recent literature is using the PRNU to classify a set of images according to the device that acquired them [5]- [7]. However, the proposed technologies have not been applied to very large databases so far [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%