2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06)
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2006.71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind Haze Separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
248
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 443 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
248
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some methods [8,9] employ multiple images of the same scene, taken under various atmospheric conditions or combined with near-infrared version [10]. Polarization methods [11][12][13] exploit the fact that airlight is partially polarized. By taking the difference of two images of the same scene under different polarization angles, it becomes possible to estimate the magnitude of the polarized haze light component.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some methods [8,9] employ multiple images of the same scene, taken under various atmospheric conditions or combined with near-infrared version [10]. Polarization methods [11][12][13] exploit the fact that airlight is partially polarized. By taking the difference of two images of the same scene under different polarization angles, it becomes possible to estimate the magnitude of the polarized haze light component.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using an atmospheric scattering model, it is critical to estimate the scene depth accurately. The literature [4][5][6] proposed using multiple images or external information to derive the scene depth map; however, this requirement is difficult to fulfill in many realworld applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some approaches make assumptions about the scene: constraints on image hue [14], on transmission [1], on image statistics [2]. In the state of art, other methods are dealing with dehazing [8,12,13]. However, they are generally not suitable to ADAS images [15] for two reasons: they are not real time or they do not take into account the context of the road (road surface, lane marking, and road signs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%