2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2004.1326255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind estimation of channel BERs in a multi-receiver network

Abstract: In wireless communications, it is often desirable to merge bit decisions from multiple receivers to improve overall link performance. It is well known that in order to optimally fuse bit decisions from a network of receivers, precise knowledge of receiver bit error rates (BERs) is needed. This information, however, is rarely available in practice. In this work, we present an iterative procedure for blindly estimating receivers BERs to enable near optimal blind fusion of bit decisions in a multi-receiver networ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [4]- [6], it is claimed that these approaches are optimal and this assertion is supported by two points. The statistic carries the same information about as the observation , and the random variables are independent.…”
Section: A Algorithms Of Dixit Et Almentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In [4]- [6], it is claimed that these approaches are optimal and this assertion is supported by two points. The statistic carries the same information about as the observation , and the random variables are independent.…”
Section: A Algorithms Of Dixit Et Almentioning
confidence: 71%
“…5. Probability of error given by the "optimal" fusion (2.2) derived from channel BER estimated by the Dixit (4.2) (o), [6] (+), and the EM (*) algorithms respectively, compared with the "optimal" fusion (-) derived from the exact values of ( ) as a function of the sample size.…”
Section: Illustrative Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations