1973
DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(73)90112-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind-ending duplications of ureter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of two ureteral orifices, multiple bud ding of the Wolffian duct leads to duplex ureters [9,12,14], For unclear reasons, there seems to be no union of one ureteral bud with the metanephric blastema in utero, resulting in a blind bifid ureter or a blind duplex ureter. In the past some short blind-end ing duplications have been classified as ureteral diverticula causing considerable confusion in terminology [4], but most of these cases could be defined as blind-ending ureters rather than diverticula [3,9,12], [15] distinguished four types of blind ending ureteral duplications ( fig. 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of two ureteral orifices, multiple bud ding of the Wolffian duct leads to duplex ureters [9,12,14], For unclear reasons, there seems to be no union of one ureteral bud with the metanephric blastema in utero, resulting in a blind bifid ureter or a blind duplex ureter. In the past some short blind-end ing duplications have been classified as ureteral diverticula causing considerable confusion in terminology [4], but most of these cases could be defined as blind-ending ureters rather than diverticula [3,9,12], [15] distinguished four types of blind ending ureteral duplications ( fig. 6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete or incomplete ureteral duplications as the most com mon congenital anomaly of the ureter may be familial [7,12,15] and the position of the ureteral orifices within the trigone is suggestive of possible dysplasia in an upper segment [11] (fig. 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation