2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1903.02764
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind Dynamic Resource Allocation in Closed Networks via Mirror Backpressure

Abstract: We study the problem of maximizing payoff generated over a period of time in a general class of closed queueing networks with finite, fixed number of supply units which circulate in the system. Demand arrives stochastically, and serving a demand unit (customer) causes a supply unit to relocate from the "origin" to the "destination" of the customer. We consider general controls including entry control, pricing, and assignment. Motivating applications include shared transportation platforms and scrip systems.Ins… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An intriguing fluctuation bound for MaxWeight is found in Sharifnassab et al (2020). More recent literature on MaxWeight and BackPressure in queueing networks has focused closed systems, such as using it as a decision rule in ride sharing platforms (see Banerjee et al (2018) and Kanoria and Qian (2019)). Another application concerns road traffic signal control (Le et al 2015, Varaiya 2013, Xiao et al 2015, which we will discuss in some more detail in Section 5.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An intriguing fluctuation bound for MaxWeight is found in Sharifnassab et al (2020). More recent literature on MaxWeight and BackPressure in queueing networks has focused closed systems, such as using it as a decision rule in ride sharing platforms (see Banerjee et al (2018) and Kanoria and Qian (2019)). Another application concerns road traffic signal control (Le et al 2015, Varaiya 2013, Xiao et al 2015, which we will discuss in some more detail in Section 5.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%