2010
DOI: 10.1155/2010/102581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blind Deconvolution of the Aortic Pressure Waveform Using the Malliavin Calculus

Abstract: Multichannel Blind Deconvolution (MBD) is a powerful tool particularly for the identification and estimation of dynamical systems in which a sensor, for measuring the input, is difficult to place. This paper presents an MBD method, based on the Malliavin calculus MC (stochastic calculus of variations). The arterial network is modeled as a Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter with unknown coefficients. The source signal central arterial pressure CAP is also unknown. Assuming that many coefficients of the FIR fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, δ ( t ) is taken as the asymptotic identity in ( L 1 ; ∗) in the domain of generalized functions. Accordingly, the inverse of the conventional convolution discussed by, for instance, Mikusinski [112], Bracewell [115], Huang and Qiu [116], Abutaleb et al [117], Rhoads and Ekstrom [118], Todoeschuck and Jensen [119], and Moreau et al [120], exists because the necessary and sufficient condition that the inverse of an operation exists is that there exists the identity in that system, see, for example, Korn and Korn [121], Zhang [122], Riley et al [123], Bronshtein et al [124], and Stillwell [125], but it should be in the sense of generalized functions. As a matter of fact, the conventional convolution itself is in that sense, see, for example, Smith [126].…”
Section: Min-plus Algebra and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, δ ( t ) is taken as the asymptotic identity in ( L 1 ; ∗) in the domain of generalized functions. Accordingly, the inverse of the conventional convolution discussed by, for instance, Mikusinski [112], Bracewell [115], Huang and Qiu [116], Abutaleb et al [117], Rhoads and Ekstrom [118], Todoeschuck and Jensen [119], and Moreau et al [120], exists because the necessary and sufficient condition that the inverse of an operation exists is that there exists the identity in that system, see, for example, Korn and Korn [121], Zhang [122], Riley et al [123], Bronshtein et al [124], and Stillwell [125], but it should be in the sense of generalized functions. As a matter of fact, the conventional convolution itself is in that sense, see, for example, Smith [126].…”
Section: Min-plus Algebra and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%